
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 440 of 2011 1. Vani JainR/o # 884/C, Jain Mohalla, VPO Dera Bassi Distt. SAS Nagar, Mohali. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Omaxe LimitedOmaxe House 7...
Case Number: 440
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 441 of 2011 1. Tarun JainR/o 884/C, Jain Mohalla, VPO Dera Bassi, Distt. SAS Nagar, Mohali. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Omaxe Ltd,Omaxe House 7, L...
Case Number: 441
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 442 of 2011 1. Rekha GargR/o Shublaw Trading Co. SCF 1/C, Sector 1, Parwanoo, Distt. Solan (HP) ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Omaxe Limited,Omaxe Ho...
Case Number: 442
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/12/501. Girdhari lal Goyalson of Baldev Raj r/o st.no.13-14,Circular road,Abohar............Appellant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Build Home Pvt ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/12/511. Jagdev singhaged about 55 years son of Atma singh r/o206 Home Land Enclave,Bathinda...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Build...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 47 of 2012 1. Kiran Aggarwal#759 SEctor-16 Panchkula-134109 ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Omaxe ChandigarhOmaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd. SCO 143-144 First Floor Sector-8/C Madhya Marg Chandigarh-160008 th...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 645 of 2011 1. Vivek Jainson of Sh. Junninder Kumar Jain R/o HOuse No. 3228/1 Sector-40/D Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Omaxe Ltd.(Formerly Omaxe Construction Ltd.) A Company Regd. under the Companies Act,...
Case Number: 645
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Parveen Kumar Garg, Adv. for the respondent
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 23 of 2012 1. M/s Omaxe Ltd.SCO No. 143-144, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh through its Sr. General Manager, Sales and Marketing, through...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHUBHANSHU SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 152 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 02/01/2012 in Complaint No. 365/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. K. NAGESHS/o Mr. K. Vengaish, R/o H No. 140, Ground Floor, Back side portion, Sector-15A, NOIDA-2013...
Case Number: 152
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHUBHANSHU SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 153 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 02/01/2012 in Complaint No. 366/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. K. NAGESHS/o Mr. K. Vengaish, R/O H No. 140, Ground Floor, Back side portion, Sector-15A, NOIDA-2013...
Case Number: 153
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.