
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First Appeal No.687 of 2017Date of the Institution:06.06.2017Date of Decision: 27.05.20191. Omaxe Ltd., 7, Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019 through its Chairman & Managing Director.2. Omaxe Ltd., ...
Case Number: 687
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vishal Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. As per agreement, the Opposite Party agreed to pay an amount of Rs.8.56 lakhs to the complainant towards full and final settlement of all the claims raised by the complainant. Further, ta...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Service is complete.2. Sh. G.S.Jagpal, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent/complainant by filing his memorandum of appearance, which is taken on record.3. This revision petition has been filed by the revision petitioner/judgment debtor, against the ...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :23.05.2019Date of Decision : 17.06.2019 COMPLAINT NO.986 /2018In the matter of: Naveen Mittal, S/o Om Prakash Mittal, R/o House no. 355, Ramnagar, Kirana Mandi, Gazi...
Case Number: 986
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-06-2019
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/101/2013( Date of Filing : 15 Feb 2013 )1. MR. SURENDRA KUMAR BAGARIAA-602, KESAR GARDEN, SECTOR 48, NOIDA, U.P. 201304............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. OMAXE LIMITED7, LOCAL SHOPPING CENTER, KAL...
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.206 of 2018Date of Institution:19.02.2018 Date of Decision:11.04.2019M/s Omaxe Ltd., Regd. office at 7, Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019 through its authorized signatory namely Sh. De...
Case Number: 206
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2019
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Batra
Respondant Advocate Sh. A.S. Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 436/2017( Date of Filing : 27 Jul 2017 )1. Kartar S/o Sh. Khem Chand r/o H.No. 760-A Vishal Nagar Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe HappyHome II Rohtak through its Branch Manager......
Case Number: 436
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2019
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Batra
Respondant Advocate Sh. A.S. Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 437/2017( Date of Filing : 27 Jul 2017 )1. Kartar Singh S/o Khem Chand r/o H.No. 760-A Vishal Nagar Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe HappyHome II Rohtak through its Branch Manager....
Case Number: 437
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2019
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Batra
Respondant Advocate Sh. A.S. Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 438/2017( Date of Filing : 27 Jul 2017 )1. Pararthana Chahal D/o Sh. Kartar Singh r/o H.No. 760-A Vishal Nagar Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe HappyHome II Rohtak through its Bran...
Case Number: 438
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2019
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Batra
Respondant Advocate Sh. A.S. Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 439/2017( Date of Filing : 27 Jul 2017 )1. Seema Chahal D/o Sh. Kartar Singh r/o H.No. 760-A Vishal Nagar Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe HappyHome II Rohtak through its Branch Ma...
Case Number: 439
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.