Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1203 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
M/S Omaxe Ltd V/S Krishan Mohan Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Veer Raghav Chaubey
Respondant Advocate Vineet K S Bisen
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/201/2015( Date of Filing : 10 Sep 2015 )1. Arvind MishraKanpur Nagar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Omaxe LtdNew Delhi............Opp.Par...
Case Number: 203
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2019
M/S Omaxe Ltd V/S Madan Mohan Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Veer Raghav Chaubey
Respondant Advocate V K S Bisen
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/201/2015( Date of Filing : 10 Sep 2015 )1. Arvind MishraKanpur Nagar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Omaxe LtdNew Delhi............Opp.Par...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2019
M/S Omaxe Ltd V/S Arvind Mishra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Veer Raghav Chaubey
Respondant Advocate V K S Bisen & Rajesh Chadha
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/201/2015( Date of Filing : 10 Sep 2015 )1. Arvind MishraKanpur Nagar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Omaxe LtdNew Delhi............Opp.Par...
Case Number: 201
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2019
M/s omaxe Ltd V/S Tajinder Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate T H naqvi
Respondant Advocate V K S Bisen
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/201/2015( Date of Filing : 10 Sep 2015 )1. Arvind MishraKanpur Nagar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Omaxe LtdNew Delhi............Opp.Par...
Case Number: 2014
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2019
Omaxe Housing & Developers Ltd. V/S Smt. Ekta Sharma
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rinku Jangra
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/503( Date of Filing : 25 Sep 2019 )1. Smt. Ekta SharmaW/o Sh. Digvijay Jakhar, R/o H.no. A-92, Preet vihar, Kanheli Road, Rohtak-124001.2. Sh. Digvijay JakharS/o Sh. Khushi Ram Jakhar, R/o...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2019
Omaxe Buildtech Limited V/S Parveen Kumar
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Complainant in person
Respondant Advocate Sh. A.S. Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 472/2018( Date of Filing : 01 Oct 2018 )1. Parveen KumarS/o Sh. Sant Lal r/o 16/R, Model Town, Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Buildtech LimitedOmaxe City, Sector-28, Rohtak.........
Case Number: 472
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2019
Omaxe Ltd V/S Sushma Tiwari
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Kaur Jugait Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER As per office Advocate Welfare Ticket not affixed. The counsel for the complainant shall affixed the Advocate Welfare Ticket before the registry on the vakalatnama. Counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the complaint that she withdraws the same with liberty ...
Case Number: 971
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2019
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Anil Bhasin
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:349 of 2018Date of Institution:13.09.2018Date of Decision:20.09.2019Anil Bhasin S/o Sh. R.K. Bhasin, r/o #126, Sector 16-A, Chandigarh.Satish Kumar Sharma S/o Sh.Chiranji Lal Sharma, r/o # A-043, Icon...
Case Number: 349
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2019
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Gauri
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:314 of 2018Date of Institution:10.08.2018Date of Decision:20.09.2019Gauri w/o Sh.Vikas Ahuja, R/o H.No.517, Blenheim Centre Hounslow, London TW31ND through her Special Power of Attorney Sneh Prabha So...
Case Number: 314
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2019
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Ltd. V/S Rahul Shahi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This execution application has been filed by the decree holders/complainants under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for execution of the order dated 10.06.2019 passed by this Commission in Consumer Complaint bearing No.340 of 2019 vide which, this Commission grante...
Case Number: 347
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 21-09-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.