Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. MAHAJAN & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S. AVA LAW ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 694 OF 20171. NISHA RANIW/o Satyaroop Singh R/o House No. 175, c Block, Mayfield Garden Sector 50, Gurgaon 122001...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. MAPSKO BUILDERS PVT. LTD.Regd. Off. 52, North Avenue ...
Case Number: 694
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PARVEEN K. KATARIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.463 of 2018Date of the Institution:13.08.2018Date of Decision: 05.07.20191. Surender Kumar Verma s/o Sh. Surajbhan Verma,2. Pramila Devi Verma w/o Sh. Surender Kumar Verma,Both R/o H.No. F-78, Sudarsha...
Case Number: 463
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PARVEEN K. KATARIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.464 of 2018Date of the Institution:13.08.2018Date of Decision: 05.07.20191. Mrs.Suman Lata wd/o Late Sh.Ramji Lal,2. Nikhil Sharma s/o Sh. Late Sh.Ramji Lal,Both R/o H.No. 14-E, Gali No.3, New Basti, B...
Case Number: 464
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SNG PARATNERS
Respondant Advocate M/S. AVA LAW ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 3872 OF 20171. AVINASH BHALLA & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. MAPSKO BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITEDThrough its managing Director, 52, North avenue Road, Punjabi Bagh West,new delhi-110026...........Opp.P...
Case Number: 3872
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SACHIN MITTAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.1100 of 2017 Date of Institution: 11.09.2017 Date of Decision: 14.01.20191. M/s Mapsko Builders Private Limited, 52, North Avenue road, Punjabi Bagh West, New Delhi-26 through its authorized sign...
Case Number: 1100
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate BY POST
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.759 of 2017Date of the Institution:29.11.2017Date of Decision: 26.11.2018Dr. Raj Luxmi, R/o 68-A, Haroja House, Patilputra Colony, Patna, Pin Code-800013. .….ComplainantVersusMapsko Builders Pvt. ...
Case Number: 759
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VISHAL YADAV
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.230 of 2016Date of the Institution:12.08.2016Date of Decision: 24.08.2018Kapil Gupta S/o Sh.Ram Avtar, Shop No.36, Anaj Mandi, Sampla, Distt. Rohtak. .….ComplainantVersusM/s Mapsko Builders Pvt. L...
Case Number: 230
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PARVEEN K. KATARIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA F.A. No.631 of 2018Date of the Institution:16.05.2018Date of Decision: 10.07.20181. Surender Kumar Verma S/o Surajbhan Verma,2. Pramila Devi Verma W/o Surender Kumar VermaBoth R/o H.NO.F-78, Sudarshan Park, New Del...
Case Number: 631
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PARVEEN K. KATARIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA F.A. No.630 of 2018Date of the Institution:16.05.2018Date of Decision: 10.07.20181. Mrs. Suman Lata Wd/o Late Sh.Ramji Lal,2. Nikhil Sharma S/o Late Sh.Ramji Lal,Both R/o H.NO.14-E, Gali No.3, New Basti, Bahadurgar...
Case Number: 630
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AVA LAW ASSOCIATES LLP
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI EXECUTION REVISION PETITION NO. 8 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 08/05/2017 in Appeal No. 27/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MANAGER, MAPSKO BUILDERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.52, North Avenue Road, Punjabi Bagh West,New Del...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mapsko in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mapsko ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mapsko under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.