
Kingfisher Airlines Kingfisher
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Y.S. Dhillon, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 174 of 2011 1. Kingfisher Airlines LimitedKingfisher House, West Express Highway, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai -400 099, Through: - ...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Manmohan Singh
Respondant Advocate Y.S.Dhillon
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 117 of 2010 1. Sh. Inderjit Singh Walia#1940 Phase-V Mohali The Claims Officer ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Kingfisher HouseWestern Express Highway Vile Parle Mumbai2. Branch ManagerKingfisher Airlines SCO 59-60 Sector-...
Case Number: 117
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kingfisher Airlines Kingfisher
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate Shrikantashetty.K, Kasaragod
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/751. Abdulrahiman AnduS/o.Andu Kolikkatta, Kolikkatta House, Chengala, Kasaragod.Dt.KasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nodal Officer, Kingfisher Airlines LtdU.B.Tower, Level.12, U.B.City, 24, Vittal Mallya Road, Bangalore. 560 001.BangaloreK...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Shelly Shukla, Bhavna & Anuj Ahluwalia
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 462 of 2010 1. Varun utreja S/o Madan Lal Utreja, R/o House No. 3291, Sector 46 - c chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. KingfisherKingfisher ho...
Case Number: 462
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kingfisher Airlines Kingfisher
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate Umesh Mangave
Respondant Advocate P.B. Jadhav
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurComplaint Case No. CC/11/136 1. Subhash Rajkumar Pangaonkar380/2N/3, Plot no. 2, Rajaram Refiles Colony, Rajarampuri 13th lane, Kolhapur. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Chairman and Managing Director, Kingfisher Airlines LtdKingfis...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kingfisher Airlines Kingfisher
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 603 of 2010 1. Ms.Lata SikriChandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Kingfisher AirlinesLtd. SCO 59-60 Sector-19/D Madhya Marg Chandigarh2. Regd. Off...
Case Number: 603
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Cachar
Appelant Advocate Prasenjit Deb
Respondant Advocate A. Biswas
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2016
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/1452/2011( Date of Filing : 05 Aug 2011 )1. MunisanjirappaBangalore-78...........Complai...
Case Number: 1452
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2022
Kingfisher Airlines Kingfisher
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U B WAVIKAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/831. MR VIVEK BANGERAB-201 NIKITA CHS BAMANDAYAPADA MAROL MILITARY ROAD MAROL ANDHERI EAST MUMBAI MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. KINGFISHER ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kingfisher Airlines Kingfisher
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 114 of 2011 1. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd.chd. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Mrs. Jagrup Kaurchd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellan...
Case Number: 114
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kingfisher in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kingfisher ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kingfisher under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.