company-name-logo

It

Latest Judgments

Total 794 Consumer Court Cases Against It.

Orissa

(1) The Regional Manager, Union Bank of India (formally it was Andhra Bank) V/S Meka Satya Prasad

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   It  

Court Name: Bargarh

Appelant Advocate Sri C.R. Panda, Advocate with other Advocates

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BARGARH (ODISHA)AT. COURT PREMISES,PO.PS.DISTRICT. BARGARH PIN. 768028Complaint Case No. CC/71/2020( Date of Filing : 28 Aug 2020 )1. Meka Satya PrasadR/o. Village. Kulunda (Andhra Pada), Po. Kulunda, Ps/Tahasil. Attabira, Dist. Ba...

Case Number: 71

|

Date of Filing: 28-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 29-09-2023

Orissa

(1) The Regional Manager, Union Bank of India (formally it was Andhra Bank) V/S Meka Vera Venkat Rao

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   It  

Court Name: Bargarh

Appelant Advocate Sri C.R. Panda, Advocate with other Advocates

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BARGARH (ODISHA)AT. COURT PREMISES,PO.PS.DISTRICT. BARGARH PIN. 768028Complaint Case No. CC/70/2020( Date of Filing : 28 Aug 2020 )1. Meka Vera Venkat RaoR/o. Village. Kulunda (Andhra Pada), Po. Kulunda, Ps/Tahasil. Attabira, Dist....

Case Number: 70

|

Date of Filing: 28-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 29-09-2023

Orissa

(1) The Regional Manager, Union Bank of India (formally it was Andhra Bank) V/S Meka Sita Mahalaxmi

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   It  

Court Name: Bargarh

Appelant Advocate Sri C.R. Panda, Advocate with other Advocates

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BARGARH (ODISHA)AT. COURT PREMISES,PO.PS.DISTRICT. BARGARH PIN. 768028Complaint Case No. CC/69/2020( Date of Filing : 28 Aug 2020 )1. Meka Sita MahalaxmiR/o. Village. Kulunda (Andhrra Pada), Po. Kulunda, Ps/Tahasil. Attabira, Dist....

Case Number: 69

|

Date of Filing: 28-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 29-09-2023

Orissa

(1) The Regional Manager, Union Bank of India (formally it was Andhra Bank) V/S Vasa Satti Raju

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   It  

Court Name: Bargarh

Appelant Advocate Sri C.R. Panda, Advocate with other Advocates

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BARGARH (ODISHA)AT. COURT PREMISES,PO.PS.DISTRICT. BARGARH PIN. 768028Complaint Case No. CC/67/2020( Date of Filing : 20 Aug 2020 )1. Vasa Satti RajuR/o. Village. Paramanpur Farm, Po. Tope, Ps/Tahasil. Attabira, Dist. Bargarh, Pin ...

Case Number: 67

|

Date of Filing: 20-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 29-09-2023

Orissa

(1) The Regional Manager, Union Bank of India (formally it was Andhra Bank) V/S Vasa Jagannadha Rao

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   It  

Court Name: Bargarh

Appelant Advocate Sri C.R. Panda, Advocate with other Advocates

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BARGARH (ODISHA)AT. COURT PREMISES,PO.PS.DISTRICT. BARGARH PIN. 768028Complaint Case No. CC/66/2020( Date of Filing : 20 Aug 2020 )1. Vasa Jagannadha RaoR/o. Village. Paramanpur Farm, Po. Tope, Ps/Tahasil. Attabira, Dist. Bargarh, ...

Case Number: 66

|

Date of Filing: 20-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 29-09-2023

Orissa

(1) The Regional Manager, Union Bank of India (formally it was Andhra Bank) V/S Saparapu Satyanarayan

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   It  

Court Name: Bargarh

Appelant Advocate Sri C.R. Panda, Advocate with other Advocates

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BARGARH (ODISHA)AT. COURT PREMISES,PO.PS.DISTRICT. BARGARH PIN. 768028Complaint Case No. CC/65/2020( Date of Filing : 20 Aug 2020 )1. Saparapu SatyanarayanR/o. Village. Paramanpur Farm, Po. Tope, Ps/Tahasil. Attabira, Dist. Bargarh...

Case Number: 65

|

Date of Filing: 20-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 29-09-2023

Uttar Pradesh

DAKSHINANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGUM LTD AGRA THROUGH IT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER V/S VIJAY SINGH

Vidyut   It  

Court Name: Agra-II

Appelant Advocate PAWAN KUMAR GAUTAM

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 381

|

Date of Filing: 17-12-2022

|

Date of Upload: 27-09-2023

Haryana

RELIANCE CORPORATE IT PARK LTD AND OTHERS V/S VIPUL NAIN

It  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2First Appeal No. A/866/2019( Date of Filing : 03 Oct 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/08/2019 in Case No. 166/2018 of District Jind)1. VIPUL NAIN46, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, NARWANA, HARYANA. ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. RELIANCE CORPORATE IT PARK LTD AND OTHER...

Case Number: 866

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 22-09-2023

West Bengal

Greentech IT City Pvt. Ltd. V/S Joyjit Bose

Greentech   Greentech It City   It  

Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate Sudipa Bhattacharya

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/502/2019( Date of Filing : 11 Dec 2019 )1. Joyjit BoseSristi,Flat-8,3rd Floor,7,Bachaspati Para Road,Dakshineswar,P.S.Belghoria,Ko...

Case Number: 502

|

Date of Filing: 11-12-2019

|

Date of Upload: 11-09-2023

West Bengal

Managing Directer,Green Tech IT City Pvt.Ltd. V/S Sri Pawan Kumar Agarwal, S/o- Sri Babulal Sanganeria

It  

Court Name: Rajarhat

Appelant Advocate Adv Ashok Kumar Ghosh, Adv Anwesa Ghosh

Respondant Advocate

Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd FloorPremises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161Complaint Case No. CC/255/2023( Date of Filing : 04 Aug 2023 )1. Sr...

Case Number: 255

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2023

|

Date of Upload: 24-08-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against It in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against It ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against It under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.