
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 19-06-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DAVINDER KUMAR MAHAJAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1617 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 28/02/2018 in Appeal No. 507/2017 of the State Commission Delhi)1. RISHABH GUPTAS/O. SH. DAVINDER GUPTA, R/O. A-72, HANS APARTMENTS NEAR KARKARDOOMA COURTSDELHI-110...
Case Number: 1617
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2018
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Devinder Sharma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.199 of 2017 Date of instt. 13.06.2017 Date of decision 11.06.2018National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal through its Director. …….Complainant. Versus1. M/s Micromax Informatic Ltd., ...
Case Number: 199
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-06-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Rajes Biswas Mr. Shibaji Shankar Dhar
Respondant Advocate Mr. P. R. Bakshi
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. FA/1215/2013( Date of Filing : 14 Nov 2013 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/08/2013 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/78/2011 of District South 24 Parganas)1. Sri Mrina...
Case Number: 1215
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-08-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. FOX MANDAL & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 05/08/2014 in Complaint No. 113/2009 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. SHEELA SRIVASTAVA (DECEASED) THROUGH LRs.W/O. SHRI RAVINDRA NATH SRIVASTAVA, R/O. A-517, INDIRA NA...
Case Number: 1009
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-06-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JURIS ADVOCATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. FOX MANDAL & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 05/08/2014 in Complaint No. 113/2009 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. SHEELA SRIVASTAVA (DECEASED) THROUGH LRs.W/O. SHRI RAVINDRA NATH SRIVASTAVA, R/O. A-517, INDIRA NA...
Case Number: 1084
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-06-2018
Court Name: Agra-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM-ICOURT CLUB, CIVIL COURT COMPOUNDAGRA, UTTAR PRADESHComplaint Case No. CCN 346/2014( Date of Filing : 31 Jul 2014 )1. HARI SINGH S/O LATE PANNA LAL,D-32 TRANS YAMUNA,AGRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DAYALBAGH ENG. INSTITUTEDAYALBAGH,...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2018
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate None
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/109/2009( Date of Filing : 19 Mar 2009 )1. Ishan Institute of Management and TechnologyGautam Buddh Nagar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Schindler India Pvt.Ltd....
Case Number: 109
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2018
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DCDRF North 24 Paraganas BarasatKolkata-700126.Execution Application No. EA/185/2013( Date of Filing : 29 Jul 2013 )InCC/7/20131. Sumit kumar and another135/81,Karunamoyee Deb Road,P.O. Talpukur,barrackpore,vill-Nuntia,P.O. Mug Kalyan,Dist-Howrah...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Th...
Case Number: 185
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEGAL OPTIONS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1025 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 17/03/2017 in Appeal No. 192/2016 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. RABINDRANATH TAGORE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CARDIAC SCIENCES124, MUKUNDAPUR E.M. BYPASS,...
Case Number: 1025
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.