India Post
Latest Judgments
Total 95 Consumer Court Cases Against India Post.
Superintendent, Suri Head Post office, India Post V/S Nandita Das
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate Sanjit Kr Acharya
Respondant Advocate
J U D G E M E N TShri Biswa Nath Konar – President. The case of the complainant Nandita Das, in brief, is that she was an MIS A/c holder being A/c No. 7045611. That on 13.07.2004 the complainant opened the said MIS A/c depositing Rs. 1,50,000/- in order to get interest @Rs....
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Superintendent, Suri Head Post office, India Post V/S Sanchita Das
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate Sanjit Kr Acharya
Respondant Advocate
J U D G E M E N TShri Biswa Nath Konar – President. The case of the complainant Sanchita Das, in brief, is that she was an MIS A/c holder being A/c No. 7050321. That on 27.07.2004 the complainant opened the said MIS A/c depositing Rs. 1,35,000/- in order to get interest @Rs...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Post Master India Post V/S Kiran Manohar Sangwai
Court Name: Nanded
Appelant Advocate Adv. R. H. Kulkarni
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Sunita Devi V/S Union of India Post office
Union Of India Post Office India Post
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sunil Sharma
Respondant Advocate T H Naqvi
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/208(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union of India Post officea...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sunita D...
Case Number: 2003
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2003
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2016
Shipra Mandwal V/S Union Of India post office
Union Of India Post Office India Post
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dr U V Singh
Respondant Advocate Vimal Kumar
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/888(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union Of India post officea...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Shipra M...
Case Number: 2004
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2004
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2017
Superintendent, Suri Head Post Office, India Post V/S Krishna Hazra, W/o Lt Bishnu Hazra
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate Sanjit Kr Acharya
Respondant Advocate
The complaint filed by one KrishnaHazraagainst the Superintendent, Department of Post,SuriHead Post office and others, is thatBishnuHazrahusband of the complainant purchased a policy under Rural Postal Life Insurance from O.P No.2. The insured died in thunder struck atPaschimMidn...
Case Number: 135
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2016
India Post Office V/S Shubham Ganesh Emekar
Court Name: Nanded
Appelant Advocate Adv. S. T. Pannaswad
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2016
India Post & Tar Department. V/S Naresh Chandra Goyal
Court Name: Jaipur-IV
Appelant Advocate Pawan Gupta
Respondant Advocate Banwari Lal Gupta & Others
Case Number: 306
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2016
The Postmaster General India Post Ambala V/S Balram S/o Suraj Bhan
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Parveen Kumar Dahiya
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.373 of 2015 Instituted on:07.10.2015 Date of order:21.07.2016Balram son of Suraj Bhan, resident of H.No.1045, Gali NO.3, Dahiya Colony, Kakroi road, Sonepat. ...Complainant. Versus1.The Post Master Ge...
Case Number: 373
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2016
Superintendent, Suri Head Post office, India Post V/S Sumanta Basak
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
The case, in brief, is that the complainant along with some friends had booked individual mail by speed post on 27.05.2013 containing an application for the post of Lower Division Assistant at Kolkata High Court and a challan of Rs. 212from UBI Bank. The articles of his friends r...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against India Post in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against India Post ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against India Post under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.