company-name-logo

India Post

Latest Judgments

Total 95 Consumer Court Cases Against India Post.

Andhra Pradesh

The Senior Superintendent, India Post V/S Tadivalasa Mohan Kumar

India Post  

Court Name: West Godavari

Appelant Advocate inperson

Respondant Advocate G.P

Case Number: 33

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 06-11-2017

Chhattisgarh

India Post H.O. & Anr. V/S Siddharth Construction

India Post  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shri Shrijan Shukla

Respondant Advocate Op-1 Shri Abhinav Agrawal/Op-2 Shri Sourabh Sharma

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 05-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-10-2017

Andaman Nicobar

Shri. Mohammed Safder V/S The Directorate of Postal Service, India Post

India Post  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr.V. D. Siva Balan

Respondant Advocate Mr. Aman Kishen Lall

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 18-09-2017

Punjab

India Post Office V/S Yogesh Kumar

Post Office   India Post  

Court Name: Barnala

Appelant Advocate Gagandeep Garg

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/616/20161. Yogesh KumarS/o Neetu Ram R/o H.No. 394, Ward No.8, Street No.1, Model Town Tapa Mandi BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. India Post Office1. India Post Office meghdoot Bhawan Link Road New Delhi India 110001 thr...

Case Number: 616

|

Date of Filing: 23-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 25-07-2017

Uttar Pradesh

N K Mandwal V/S Union Of India post office

Union Of India   Post Office   India Post  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dr U V Singh

Respondant Advocate Vimal Kumar

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/887(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union Of India post officea...........Appellant(s)Versus1. N K Mand...

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2004

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Shipra Mandwal V/S Union Of India post office

Union Of India   Post Office   India Post  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dr U V Singh

Respondant Advocate Vimal Kumar

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/885(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union Of India post officea...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Shipra M...

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2004

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Narendra Bahadur V/S Union Of India post office

Union Of India   Post Office   India Post  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dr U V Singh

Respondant Advocate vimal kumar

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/884(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union Of India post officea...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Narendra...

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2004

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2017

Uttar Pradesh

A K Mandwal V/S Union Of India post office

Union Of India   Post Office   India Post  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dr U V Singh

Respondant Advocate Vimal Kumar

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/886(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union Of India post officea...........Appellant(s)Versus1. A K Mand...

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2004

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2017

West Bengal

Superintendent, Suri Head Post office, India Post V/S Sanchita Das

India Post  

Court Name: Birbhum

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

The Dhr takes no steps. Ld. Advocate/Agent of the Dhr submits that the payment is received by the Dhr.Let Ex Case no. 6/2017 be dropped....

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 24-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 11-07-2017

Rajasthan

Smt. Neetu w/o Tarun Kumar Rathi V/S Union of India Post Master Gandi Nagar

India Post  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Surendar Singh Naruka

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1201

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 30-05-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against India Post in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against India Post ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against India Post under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.