Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2686 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
State of Haryana V/S Jaspal Singh Dhillon
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 110 of 2010 1. Jaspal Singh DhillonChd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 13 Oct 2010 ORDER DIS...
Case Number: 110
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Sada Ram Som Nath V/S Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. No. RBT/FA/232/2010FIRST APPEAL NO. FA of 2010InO.A. NO.FA/2593/2003 1. Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limitedthrough its Sub ...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
CHARU GERA & ORS. V/S DIRECTOR TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING, HARYANA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRATHAM KANT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3338-3360 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 21/05/2010 in Appeal No. 626-722/2010 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. DIRECTOR TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING, HARYANAHUDA Building, Sector 12FaridabadHaryana .......
Case Number: 3338
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2010
RAM SWAROOP V/S UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3531 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 14/08/2006 in Appeal No. 2699/2002 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTDDIVISIONAL OFFCER . SUB,DIVISION NO.1 JAGADHRI DISTT, YAM...
Case Number: 3531
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2010
M/S. P.K. ADHESIVES MFG. V/S HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. G.S. RAIKHY
Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL HOODA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3731 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 14/08/2008 in Appeal No. 3363/2001 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATIONThrough Its Managing Diretor.Chairaman SCO. 17.18.19. Sector 1...
Case Number: 3731
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2010
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. V/S DEEPAK KUMAR GOSWAMI
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. O.P.KHADARIA
Respondant Advocate MR. SURYANARAYANA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2933 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 30/08/2006 in Appeal No. 1876/2000 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DEEPAK KUMAR GOSWAMISOLAR PAINTS E-174, GREATER KAILASH -I, NEW DELHI - ...........Petition...
Case Number: 2933
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2006
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2010
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANISATION
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Railway Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate A.K.TEWARI
Respondant Advocate NA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 79 OF 20041. INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANISATION...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Fo...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2004
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2010
YASHPAL SINGH V/S HARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VISHAL GUPTA
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 937 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 01/04/2006 in Appeal No. 508/2003 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORP.3-6 SECTOR 2 PANCHKULA PANCHKULA ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 937
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2010
SHAMSHER SINGH V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNABH CHOWDHURY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1081 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/10/2009 in Appeal No. 2800/2002 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.Through its Assistant Executive Engineer, Sub...
Case Number: 1081
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 20-10-2010
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S AMIR SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIPUL RAHEJA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1112 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 07/01/2009 in Appeal No. 1539/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. AMIR SINGHS/o.Sh. Asha Singh R/o. Village. Paharipur . Tehsil Jagadhri. Yamuna Nagar Haryana ....
Case Number: 1112
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2010
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.