company-name-logo

Haryana Roadways

Latest Judgments

Total 48 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana Roadways.

Haryana

General Manager Haryana Roadways Sonepat Depot V/S Sunita

Haryana Roadways  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate Mannu Malik

Respondant Advocate Anil Sharma

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.CC/321 of 2016Instituted on: 16.08.2016 Date of order: 10.03.2017Sunita wife of RaRanbir Singh, resident of village Jauli, Tehsil Gohana, District Sonipat. …ComplainantVersusGeneral Manager, Harya...

Case Number: 321

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 20-03-2017

Haryana

Haryana Roadways V/S Amar D kamra

Haryana Roadways  

Court Name: Sirsa

Appelant Advocate Harish Chhabra/

Respondant Advocate Ajay,R Shrora/BL Narula

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 186/121. Amar D kamraTohana Road Ratia distt fatehabadfatehabadHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana Roadwaysfatehabad Depot Bus St fatehabadFatehabadHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sh S.B Lohia PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR....

Case Number: 186

|

Date of Filing: 07-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 22-09-2016

Haryana

GENERAL MANAGER HARYANA ROADWAYS V/S SATISH KUMAR

Haryana Roadways  

Court Name: Palwal

Appelant Advocate SIDDHANT SINGH

Respondant Advocate AUTH REP.

Case Number: 120

|

Date of Filing: 17-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-09-2016

Chandigarh

Director, Haryana Roadways V/S Ashok Kumar Prajapat

Haryana Roadways  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Krishan Lal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/853/2015Date of Institution:22/12/2015Date of Decision:25/05/2016Ashok Kumar Parjapat, resident of Village Mohla, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar, Haryana.…..ComplainantV E R S U S1...

Case Number: 853

|

Date of Filing: 22-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 27-05-2016

Delhi

HARYANA ROADWAYS V/S V.P. SHARMA

Haryana Roadways  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/11/482(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/08/2011 in Case No. 454/09 of District North)1. V.P. SHARMAA-4/32 ORIENTAL ENCLAVE, INDRAPURASTHA EXTN. DELHI-92...........Appellant...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

HARYANA ROADWAYS & ORS. V/S V.P. SHARMA

Haryana Roadways  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. KAMAL K. SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1419 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 24/01/2011 in Appeal No. 29/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. V.P. SHARMAResident of A-4/32, Indraprastha ExtensionDelhi - 110092Delhi...........Petitioner(s)Ve...

Case Number: 1419

|

Date of Filing: 28-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 11-05-2011

Chandigarh

Haryana Roadways V/S Jaspal Singh Dhillon

Haryana Roadways  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 10 of 2011 1. Jaspal Singh DhillonH.No 5791-A, Sector - 38(West), Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Haryana Roadwaysthrough State Tran...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 04-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Jaspal Singh Dhillon V/S Haryana Roadways

Haryana Roadways  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh.Rajiv Parshad, Adv. for appellant

Respondant Advocate Sh.Gunjan Rishi, Adv. for OP

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 289 of 2010 1. Haryana Roadwaysthrough State Transport Commissioner/Controller (Director General State Transport, Haryana), 2nd F...

Case Number: 289

|

Date of Filing: 23-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana Roadways in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana Roadways ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana Roadways under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.