
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P. K. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate M/S. AHUJA ARORA & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 538 OF 2013 IN RP/4660/20101. ASHWANI ANAND...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. GEE CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BL...
Case Number: 538
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P. K. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 539 OF 2013 IN RP/4661/20101. ASHWANI ANAND...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. GEE CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BL...
Case Number: 539
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VAIBHAV GAGGAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 540 OF 2013 IN RP/4662/20101. ASHWANI ANAND...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. GEE CITY BUIDERS PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE...
Case Number: 540
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2013
The New India Assurance New India Assurance Gee
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mrs. Agnes Martins
Respondant Advocate M/s. S. R. Singh & Co.
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/07/231. Gee Square ExportsThrough its Manager and C.A. Mr. L.E. Ramaswamy A. , Off. at 522, The Great Eastern Galleria, Plot 20, Sector 4, Nerul (West), Navi Mumbai 400 706, ...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL SETH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1371 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/01/2012 in Appeal No. 351/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. GEE CITY BUILDERS (P) LTD. & ANR.1464 Sector- 13BChandigarhChandigarh2. Jatinder Mittal, S/o...
Case Number: 1371
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P. K. DUBEY & MS. NEHA GUPTA
Respondant Advocate M/S. AHUJA ARORA & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 791 OF 2012 IN RP/4660/20101. ASHWANI ANAND...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. GEE CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BL...
Case Number: 791
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P. K. DUBEY & MS. NEHA GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 792 OF 2012 IN RP/4661/20101. ASHWANI ANAND...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. GEE CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BL...
Case Number: 792
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VAIBHAV GAGGAR & MS. NEHA GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 793 OF 2012 IN RP/4662/20101. ASHWANI ANAND...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. GEE CITY BUIDERS PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE...
Case Number: 793
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2013
Court Name: Pathanamthitta
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/1861. GEE VARIGHESE KOSHYPulladamannil House, Nariyapuram.P.O, Vallicode Village,Kozhencherry Taluk,Pathanamthitta............Complainant(s)Versus1. JOSE A VAdackal Jithu Bhavan, Mathoor P.O, Kozhencherry Taluk, Pathanamthitta. 2. ManiCarpentering Works,M...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhMISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 110 of 2012 1. Upkiran KaurChd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 29 Jun 2012 ORDER BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH Misc. Ap...
Case Number: 110
|
Date of Filing: 26-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Gee in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Gee ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Gee under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.