Employees
Latest Judgments
Total 3351 Consumer Court Cases Against Employees.
The MDU Employees V/S Hema Miglani
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. K.L. Khera
Respondant Advocate JD no. 2 absent.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/81/2013( Date of Filing : 18 Nov 2013 )In427/20081. Hema Miglaniw/o Rajesh Miglani r/o 70 Mansarover Colony, Rohtak............Appellant(s)Versus1. The MDU EmployeesCoop. Urban (SE) T and...
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2024
The M.D.U. Employees V/S MS. Ritika Narang
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. K.L. Khera
Respondant Advocate Jd No1 and 2 absent
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/79/2013( Date of Filing : 18 Nov 2013 )In424/20081. MS. Ritika Narangd/o Sh. Raj Kumar R/o WZ 1459 First Floor-A Rani Bagh Shakurbasti, New Delhi............Appellant(s)Versus1. The M.D.U...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2024
M.D.U. Employees V/S Inder Singh Budhwar
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. K.L. Khera
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/78/2013( Date of Filing : 18 Nov 2013 )In266/20081. Inder Singh Budhwars/o Sh. Abhay Ram r/o 661 Sector-14, Rohtak............Appellant(s)Versus1. M.D.U. Employees Coop, Urban (SE) T and ...
Case Number: 78
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2024
The M.D.U. Employees V/S Parmila Sharma
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. K.L. Khera
Respondant Advocate Jd No1 and 2 absent
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/77/2013( Date of Filing : 18 Nov 2013 )In673/20081. Parmila SharmaWd/o Sh. Subhash Chander Sharma S/o Narain Dutt Sharma, r/o Ganga Bishan nagar near Prem Nagar Chowk, Rohtak............A...
Case Number: 77
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2024
M.D.U. Employees V/S Vijay Wason
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. K.L. Khera
Respondant Advocate Jd No1 and 2 absent
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/76/2013( Date of Filing : 18 Nov 2013 )In337/20091. Vijay WasonS/o Om Parkash...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M.D.U. Employees Coo-op Urban (SE) T and C Society Ltd. (Regd) 119-B Subhash N...
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2024
The M.D.U. Employees Coop. V/S MS DEEPIKA
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate SH. K. L. KHERA ADV.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/39/2010( Date of Filing : 04 Feb 2010 )In1. MS DEEPIKAD/o Sh. Ramesh Lal Ranjan2. 2. Ms Shilpa D/o Ramesh Lal Ranjan, 3. Mr. Puneet Ranjan S/o Ramesh Lal Ranjan,4. Versha Ranjan W/o Sh. R...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2024
M.D.U. Employees V/S K. L. BATRA
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate SH. K. L. KHERA ADV.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/196/2009( Date of Filing : 05 Nov 2009 )In1. K. L. BATRAS/o Sh. R. Batra r/o 2540 Sector-1, HUDA Rohtak............Appellant(s)Versus1. M.D.U. Employees Coop. Urban (SE) T and C Society L...
Case Number: 196
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2024
The Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund, Chikmagalur V/S Smt. Sumithra, Gooli Bilalu, Horanadu, Kalasa Taluk, Chikmagalur Dist
Court Name: Chikmagalur
Appelant Advocate K S Ananthesh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 133
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2023
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2024
The President NEKRTC Employees Pattina V/S Srinivas S/o Jagannath Mari
Court Name: Gulbarga
Appelant Advocate Vaijinath S. Zalki Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2021
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2024
The President NEKRTC Employees Pattina V/S Sharanakumar S/o Someshekar Padashetty
Court Name: Gulbarga
Appelant Advocate Vaijinath S. Zalki Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2021
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2024
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Employees in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Employees ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Employees under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.