Employees
Latest Judgments
Total 3351 Consumer Court Cases Against Employees.
UAS Employees House Building Co Operative Society Ltd. V/S Sri. H. Shankar Kumar Son of late. Hanumegowda, Aged about 50 Years
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate Shrikanta
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2024
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2024
The President, ITI Employees Housing Co-operative Society Limited, V/S Sri. H.N. Raghunatha,
Co-operative Society Society Employees
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Venkatesh. T
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 333
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2023
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2024
LALITHAMMA V/S THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT COMMISSIONER
Provident Fund Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K V KARMACHANDRAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONTHIRUVANANTHAPURAMFirst Appeal No. A/15/961( Date of Filing : 14 Dec 2015 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/10/2015 in Case No. CC/85/2014 of District Kollam)1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT COMMISSIONERSUB R...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2024
The Commissioner,Ms. Employees Provident Fund Organisation V/S Mrs.M.Nagamani, W/o. Manisamy
Provident Fund Provident Fund Employees
Court Name: Salem
Appelant Advocate Adv E.Kastro Prakash
Respondant Advocate Mr.M.R.Duraisame
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2023
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2024
The Employees Provident Fund Organisation V/S Saritha A P
Provident Fund Provident Fund Employees
Court Name: Palakkad
Appelant Advocate Viju.K. Raphel
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, KeralaComplaint Case No. CC/253/2023( Date of Filing : 26 Sep 2023 )1. Saritha A PD/o. Panchali , Arnipadam, Kadampazhipuram, Ottappalam, Palakkad - 678 633 ...........C...
Case Number: 253
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2023
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2024
Telecom Employees and others Housing Welfare Trust (R) V/S Sri.Shankara Kumar H.S.
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate D.B.R.Law Associates
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 283
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2023
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2024
The Assistant P.F. Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office V/S Angabala Das
Provident Fund Provident Fund Employees
Court Name: Murshidabad
Appelant Advocate Subhanjan Sengupta
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionBerhampore, Murshidabad.Complaint Case No. CC/41/2020( Date of Filing : 28 Feb 2020 )1. Angabala DasW/o Purna Chandra Das, Vill-Amuha, PO-Kadamtala, PS-Suti, Pin-742224MurshidabadWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Assis...
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2024
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. . V/S SMT. MEDHA NAIK .
Co-operative Society Society Government Employees
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUTHANNA T P
Respondant Advocate C.K
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.Execution Application No. EA/68/2023( Date of Filing : 13 Jul 2023 )InComplaint Case No. CC/117/20201. SMT. MEDHA NAIK .W/O.SRI.VISHWESHARIAH,AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,R/AT. NO.B-22, MAGNOLIA B TATA SHERWOO...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2023
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2024
The president, BEML Employees Housing Co-operative Society limited, V/S B.N. Purushothama,
Co-operative Society Society Employees
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Party In Person
Case Number: 296
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2023
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2024
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION EPFO V/S VIRENDER KUMAR JAIN
Provident Fund Provident Fund Employees
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate I.P(Virendra Kumar Jain)
Respondant Advocate M.R.S
Date of Filing :19.07.2023Date of Disposal :13.03.2024BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH)DATED:13.03.2024PRESENTHON’BLE Mr JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH : PRESIDENTMr K BSANGANNANAVAR: JUDICIAL MEMBERMrs DIVYASHREE M:LA...
Case Number: 1400
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2023
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2024
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Employees in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Employees ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Employees under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.