
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JAIYESH BAKHSHI
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 7626
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh K. Sharma, Adv. for Sh. Rakesh Bajaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sunil Kalra, Adv. for Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Adv. for Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Complaint Case No. CC/49/20131. Sh. Amit Purison of Sh. Gian Chand Puri Resident of #2, Chatterton CRT, Brampton, Untario, LGW$HI Canada...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Emaar MGF land Pvt. Ltd. SCO 120-122, Sector-17-C, Chandigarh through its Director2. Emaar MGF land Pvt. Ltd. ...
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. N.M. POPLI & MR. RAJAN KHETERPAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3053 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 164/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. JAWAHARLAL JAINS/O LATE SHRI RAM JAIN, R/O HOUSE NO/067,SECTOR-8-ACHANDIGARH...........Petit...
Case Number: 3053
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANINDITA KATYAL & MR. VARUN KATYAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3107 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 165/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. MANJU JAINW/O JAWAHAR LAL JAIN, R/O HOUSE NO-67 SECTOR-8-ACHANDIGARH...........Petitioner(s)...
Case Number: 3107
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY AND BAKSHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3132 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 164/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/5518/20131. EMAAR MGFLAND PRIVATE LTD. & 2 ORS.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SCOI...
Case Number: 3132
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKSHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3133 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 165/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/5519/20131. EMAAR MFG LAND PRIVATE LTD. & 2 ORS.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SCO...
Case Number: 3133
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3264 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 14/06/2013 in Appeal No. 17/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/5755/20131. EMAAR MGF LAND PVT. LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SCO-120-1...
Case Number: 3264
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate CHAMBER OF JAITLEY & BAKSHI
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 143 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 22/02/2011 in Complaint No. 54/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED & ANR.SCO 120-122, Sector-17-CChandigarhChandigarh2. General Manager (Cus...
Case Number: 143
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate CHAMBER OF JAITLEY & BAKSHI,
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 143 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 22/02/2011 in Complaint No. 54/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED & ANR.SCO 120-122, Sector-17-CChandigarhChandigarh2. General Manager (Cus...
Case Number: 144
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKSHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3058 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/07/2013 in Appeal No. 17/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. EMAAR MGF LAND PVT. LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SCO - 120-122 SECTOR-17-CCHA...
Case Number: 3058
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-09-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.