
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill
Respondant Advocate
Before the Lok Adalat held in District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 212 OF 2016Rajinder Kaur Saini Vs Emaar MGF Land Ltd.BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBER ASHOK RAJ BHANDARI, MEMBER...
Case Number: 212
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DINESH C. PANDEY & MR. TUSHAR SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 11/01/2016 in Complaint No. 13/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. KAWAL RAJ SINGHS/O. LATE SH. SARUP SINGH, R/O. H NO. 1595, SECTOR-34-D, CHANDIGARH...........App...
Case Number: 371
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DINESH C. PANDEY & MR. TUSHAR SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 372 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 11/01/2016 in Complaint No. 14/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. KESHAV DATT SREEDHARS/O. LATE SH. BRAHNM DATT, R/O. H NO. 1105, SECTOR-2, PANCHKULA HARYANA .......
Case Number: 372
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:62 of 2016Date of Institution:15.02.2016Date of Decision:02.06.2016Mrs. (Dr.) Avneet Kaur Bajaj wife of Mr.P.S Bajaj, aged 40 years, House No.1501/2, Sector 43-B, Chandigarh-160022.Mr.P.S. Bajaj son o...
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paramjit Batta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:38 of 2016Date of Institution:01.02.2016Date of Decision:01.06.2016Chander Bhushan son of Dr. Brij Lal.Mrs. Sunila wife of Chander Bhushan son of Dr. Brij Lal.Both are residents of House No. 1289, Sec...
Case Number: 38
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ROHIT GOSWAMI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.97 of 2016 Date of Institution: 21.04.2016 Date of Decision: 31.05.2016Santosh Arya W/o Mr.Ram S.Arya, R/o 190 SW, Palm Cover Drive Palm City, Florida, FL34990, USA., at present resident of 20 Gumani ...
Case Number: 97
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mohan Singh Ghuman,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:34 of 2016Date of Institution:28.01.2016Date of Decision:30.05.2016Mrs. Satwant Kaur SRA, Aged 58 years w/o Sh. Mohinder Singh Sra r/o 10, Suthon Way, Houselaw, Middlesex, TWSOJA, United Kingdom.Local...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M. SALIM
Respondant Advocate MR. THAKUR SUMIT, MS. YASHMEET KAUR, MR. SHUBHANKAR SENGUPTA & MS. MAANSI SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 128 OF 20101. M/S. AURO SUGAR PVT. LTD.6-B, Jor Bagh Lane,New Delhi - 110 003Delhi...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. EMAAR MFG. LAND LTD.ECE House, 28, Kasturba Gandhi Marg,New Delhi - 110 001Delhi.......
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rakesh Sharma
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 13 OF 2016in CC/242/2015Manjeet Singh Dhillon & anr.Vs M/s Emaar MGF Land Limited & anr.BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kabir Sarin Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:61 of 2016Date of Institution:15.02.2016Date of Decision:19.05.2016Col. Karan Singh Thandi r/o Thandi Farm, Village Kundi, Opposie GH-91, Sector 20, Panchkula – 134109.……Complainan...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.