
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint Case No.630 of 2018Date of the Institution:19.11.2018Date of Decision: 04.12.2019Mamta wife of Shri Yashpal Malik, R/o 1837/30, Vikas Nagar, Gali No.03, Kakroi Road, Sonepat (Haryana). .….Complainant...
Case Number: 630
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N. KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing:18.11.2019 Date of decision:27.11.2019Complaint No.1591/2018IN THE MATTER OFAnurag Soni304, Olive-2, Prestige,St. John’s Wood, Madiwala ….ComplainantVE...
Case Number: 1591
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate T.H. Naqvi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Execution Application No. EA/1/2016( Date of Filing : 06 Jan 2016 )InComplaint Case No. C/2010/1121. Rakshit Raj Gambhir Lucknow...........Appellant(s)Versus1. ELDEC...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. H.K.J. & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 698 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 29/08/2018 in Complaint No. 77/2017 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE & PROPERTIES LTD. & 2 ORS.UNIT NO C2/4FF, ELDECO HILLSIDE NEEMRANA ALWAR RA...
Case Number: 698
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 20-05-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Niraj Kumar
Respondant Advocate Vikas Agrawal
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/162/2014( Date of Filing : 03 Dec 2014 )1. Miss. Puja BhattLucknow...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Eldeco HousinghHariyana............Opp.Part...
Case Number: 162
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2019
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. J.S. Mann
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/16/293( Date of Filing : 02 Nov 2016 )1. PoonamW/o Rajesh R/o H.No. 1815 sec-18 HUDA, PanipatPanipat...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager, Projects office Eldeco Estate OneSec-40, G.T.Raod, ...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV BAHL & AJIT KUMAR
Respondant Advocate M/S. H.K. J & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 180 OF 20101. RAJIV MARWAH & ANR.R/o B-6/48, Safdarjung EnclaveNew Delhi - 110 029...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE & PROPERTIES LTD.Through Mr. Pankaj Bajaj, M.D., 201-212, Splendor ...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.k. Srivastava
Respondant Advocate R Chadha
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/65/2016( Date of Filing : 03 Mar 2016 )1. Yogesh DixitLucknow...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Eldeco HousingLucknow............Opp.Party(s) BE...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Complaint case No.456/2012Smt. Bimla Dahiya … ComplainantVersusM/s. Eldeco Infrastructure & Properties Ltd. … Opposite PartyBEFORE:Justice Veena Birbal, Preside...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 18-06-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/386/2017InC/94/20031. Chandra Mohan SinghAgra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. The EldecoAgra...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE M...
Case Number: 386
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Eldeco in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Eldeco ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Eldeco under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.