Diagnostic Centre
Latest Judgments
Total 137 Consumer Court Cases Against Diagnostic Centre.
Kokan Critical Care Lab Diagnostic Centre Pvt.Ltd. through Director & Land Owner through Developer & V/S Rikibchand Lakhimchand Oswal
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate P.J.Powar
Respondant Advocate Umesh Mangave
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurComplaint Case No. CC/10/122 1. Rikibchand Lakhimchand OswalPlot no-71.Ambai Difence Colony.Kolhapur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Kokan Critical Care Lab Diagnostic Centre Pvt.Ltd. through Director & Land Owner through Developer ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Down Town Diagnostic Centre V/S Smti Arundhati Datta
Court Name: East Khasi Hills
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMEAST KHASI HILLS, SHILLONGMEGHALAYAComplaint Case No. cc 17/2008( Date of Filing : 21 Apr 2008 )1. Smti Arundhati Datta Lummawrie Hills, Laitumkhrah, Shillong...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Down Town Diagnostic CentreArbuthnot Road, Non...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2022
The Proprietor, Hindustan Diagnostic centre V/S Ajitha
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate N. Raj Mohan
Respondant Advocate
CDRF TVMCDRF ThiruvananthapuramComplaint Case No. CC/09/272 1. AjithaAluthattu puthen veedu, kavalakulam, Neyyattinkara, TvpmKerala ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. The Proprietor, Hindustan Diagnostic centreOppo. casuality, Taluk hospital , neyyattinkaraKerala ...........Respond...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SRI. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN, GENERAL MANAGER V/S P.M. SHAHUL HAMEED, JANATHE DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMB2 BLOCK, CIVIL STATION, PIN-676 505consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/279 P.M. SHAHUL HAMEED, JANATHE DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE ...........Appellant(s)Vs.SRI. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN, GENERAL MANAGERM/S Blue Dart agencies ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. ...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
BABY SNEHA AGARWAL, MINOR V/S M/S VIJAYA DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S P.ROY REDDY
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/1201/08(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. M/S VIJAYA DIAGNOSTIC CENTRER/O MAIN BRANCH OFFICE, AT TIRUMALA APTS, SKY LINE THEATRE LANE, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYD. BEFORE: PRESENT: ORDERBEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRE...
Case Number: 1201
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Vijaya Diagnostic Centre V/S Baby Sneha Agarwal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s P. Srinath
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/311/06(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)1. Baby Sneha AgarwalR/o 16-1-553/2/8 Saidabad Hyd. BEFORE: PRESENT: ORDERBEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONAT HYDERABAD. F.A. 311/2006 against C.D. 434/...
Case Number: 311
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Spandan Diagnostic Centre Pvt. Ltd. V/S Smt. Mamata Chakraborty
Court Name: Paschim Midnapore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 74
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2004
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2019
Sunil Kumar V/S Sono Logist Shivam Ultra Sound Diagnostic Centre through Dr. Mahendra Kumar Jaiswal.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s Kailash Prasad Deo, Girish Mohan Singh and Ashish Jha
Respondant Advocate Mr. Ranjan Kr. Singh
Case Number: 100
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2023
M/S ALEKYA DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE V/S P.BHOPAL REDDY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S T.V.RAJESHWER RAO
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/1925/05(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Kurnool)1. P.BHOPAL REDDYR/O BONTHA PALLY JINNARAM MEDAKAndhra Pradesh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S ALEKYA DIAGNOSTIC CENTRES.NO 7-2-98 SAJJANLAL STREET OPP. GHANDHI HOSPITAL MAIN GATE SECUND...
Case Number: 1925
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Managing Director, Subham Hospital & Diagnostic Centre Pvt. Ltd., V/S Sri Rathindra Nath Pandit,
Court Name: Cooch Behar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Diagnostic Centre in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Diagnostic Centre ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Diagnostic Centre under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.