Diagnostic Centre
Latest Judgments
Total 137 Consumer Court Cases Against Diagnostic Centre.
RITU VATS & ANR. V/S M/S. KAMLA CHARITABLE DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANANT AGARWAL & MR. PANKAJ CHANDGOTHIA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2260 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 11/10/2017 in Complaint No. 4/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. KAMLA CHARITABLE DIAGNOSTIC CENTRESCF-65, SECTOR-6.PANCHKULA............Appellant(s)Versus1. R...
Case Number: 2260
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2017
Case Number: 499
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2003
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2017
Faith Diagnostic Centre V/S Rakhi Gupta
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Anirudh Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate Abhinav Kansal,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:835 of 2016Date of Institution:05.10.2016Date of Decision:08.09.2017Rakhi Gupta w/o Sh.Nitin Gupta, R/o H.No.1371, Silverton Cooperative Society, Sector 48-B, Chandigarh. …..Complaina...
Case Number: 835
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2017
Health Max Diagnostic Centre V/S Rathin Poddar
Court Name: Jalpaiguri
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, JALPAIGURI Miscellaneous Application No. MA/8/2017InComplaint Case No. CC/6/20171. Rathin PoddarSenpara, 2 no. Kalipara, P.S.- Kotwali, Dist.- Jalpaiguri............Appellant(s)Versus1. Health Max Diagnostic CentreLoknath Tower, Kadamta...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2017
Pritam Singh V/S Supreme Diagnostic Centre
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vineet Sehgal & Sandhu Ram, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled. Both the parties agreed that towards full and final settlement, the appellants will pay an amount of Rs.10.50 Lacs plus interest, which may have accrued on the deposited amount with this Commission, to the res...
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2017
Adonis Lab Systems Through Its Derector /Manager V/S N.K.Kulhari For Kullhari Diagnostic Centre & Reasearch Centre
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dr.Vikram Singh Nain
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 381/2017Adonis Lab Systems (International) through Director 352, 1st floor, Katewa Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur.Vs.N.K.Kulhari c/o Kulhari Diagnostic Centre and Research Centre r/o 6...
Case Number: 448
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2017
Khandelwal Diagnostics, Automated Clinical Lab & Molecular Diagnostic Centre V/S Harjinder Jit Singh
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Vivek Kathuria Adv. & Ajay Singla Adv.
Respondant Advocate Vikram Anand,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:965 of 2016Date of Institution:16.11.2016Date of Decision:28.07.2017Harjinder Jit Singh s/o Sh.Davinder Singh, R/o Tanda Khem, Post Office Kela Khera, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand. &hellip...
Case Number: 965
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2017
Health Max Diagnostic Centre V/S Rathin Poddar
Court Name: Jalpaiguri
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2017
DR SARIKA RANA DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE V/S RAJIV KUMAR S/O MAHI PAL SINGH
Court Name: Baghpat
Appelant Advocate RAMAN KUMAR CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate SUNIL KUMAR ARORA & 1 Others
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 12-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2017
M/s PGI Radio Diagnostic Centre V/S Ambica
Court Name: Gurdaspur
Appelant Advocate Sh.V.K.Dutta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Navin Gupta, Adv. for OPs.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GURDASPURDISTRICT COURTS, JAIL ROAD, GURDASPURPHONE NO. 01874-245345Complaint Case No. CC/297/20161. AmbicaW/o Bharat Aggarwal S/o Pardeep Kumar r/o 60/2 Dharampura colony Batala Distt gurdaspur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s PGI ...
Case Number: 297
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-06-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Diagnostic Centre in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Diagnostic Centre ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Diagnostic Centre under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.