company-name-logo

Development Board


Latest Judgments

Total 267 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Board.

Circuit Bench Nagpur

THE CHIEF OFFICER,NAGPUR HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD V/S SHRI.JANARDAN LANDE S/O LAXMANRAO LANDE

Development Board  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M.G.BURDE

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURComplaint Case No. CC/16/69( Date of Filing : 06 Sep 2016 )1. SHRI.AJAY RADHELAL SHARNAGATR/O.HOUSE NO.734,VILLAGE.NAVIN YERKHEDA,TAH & POST-KAMPTEE,DISTT-NAGPUR-441001NAGPURMAHARASHTRA...........Co...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2018

Circuit Bench Nagpur

THE CHIEF OFFICER,NAGPUR HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD V/S SHRI.SAYYAD SHANEALI S/O NADAR ALI

Development Board  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M.G.BURDE

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURComplaint Case No. CC/16/69( Date of Filing : 06 Sep 2016 )1. SHRI.AJAY RADHELAL SHARNAGATR/O.HOUSE NO.734,VILLAGE.NAVIN YERKHEDA,TAH & POST-KAMPTEE,DISTT-NAGPUR-441001NAGPURMAHARASHTRA...........Co...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2018

Circuit Bench Nagpur

THE CHIEF OFFICER,NAGPUR HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD V/S SHRI.ASHWINKUMAR THAKKAR S/O ODHAVAJIBHAI THAKKAR

Development Board  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SHRI.D.M.BURDE

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURComplaint Case No. CC/16/69( Date of Filing : 06 Sep 2016 )1. SHRI.AJAY RADHELAL SHARNAGATR/O.HOUSE NO.734,VILLAGE.NAVIN YERKHEDA,TAH & POST-KAMPTEE,DISTT-NAGPUR-441001NAGPURMAHARASHTRA...........Co...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2018

Circuit Bench Nagpur

THE CHIEF OFFICER, NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, A MHADA UNIT. V/S SHRI. DR. VIRENDRA RATANSING RATHOD

Development Board  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate ADV. M.G.BURDE

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURComplaint Case No. CC/16/69( Date of Filing : 06 Sep 2016 )1. SHRI.AJAY RADHELAL SHARNAGATR/O.HOUSE NO.734,VILLAGE.NAVIN YERKHEDA,TAH & POST-KAMPTEE,DISTT-NAGPUR-441001NAGPURMAHARASHTRA...........Co...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 09-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2018

Uttar Pradesh

National Dairy Development Board V/S Aditya Swaroop Joshi

Development Board  

Court Name: Varanasi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2005

|

Date of Upload: 09-01-2018

Maharashtra

SHRI. A.R.VAIDYA V/S PUNE HSG AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD THROUGH ESTATE MANAGER

Development Board   Pune  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 28-06-2001

|

Date of Upload: 13-11-2017

Maharashtra

Chief Officer, Konkan Housing And Area Development Board V/S Shri Prasant Mukund Patil

Development Board  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 08-08-2017

Maharashtra

DILIP M. KULKARNI V/S PUNE HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD . CHIEF OFFICER & ORS

Development Board   Pune  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2017

Maharashtra

RAMESH S. KAJALE V/S PUNE HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD . CHIEF OFFICER & ORS

Development Board   Pune  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 10-08-2017

Maharashtra

PRABHAKAR G. SHENDE & ORS V/S PUNE HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD . CHIEF OFFICER & ORS

Development Board   Pune  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Board in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Board ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.