company-name-logo

Development Board

Latest Judgments

Total 249 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Board.

Maharashtra

CHIEF OFFICER, NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND 2 OTHERS V/S SHRI MANOHAR TULSHIRAM MESHRAM

Development Board  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate SHRI GUNRATNA T. RAMTEKE

Respondant Advocate ADV. KASTURE

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/262/2020( Date of Filing : 31 Jul 2020 )1. SHRI MANOHAR TULSHIRAM MESHRAMH.I.G. B 11, 40 BLOCK, HIGH INCOME GROUP, NAGPUR MHADA...

Case Number: 262

|

Date of Filing: 31-07-2020

|

Date of Upload: 27-07-2023

Karnataka

The Development Officer Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board V/S Ramshetty S/o Bheemrao Bhadbade

Development Board  

Court Name: Bidar

Appelant Advocate Mailare Mallikarjun

Respondant Advocate Deshpande PM

DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BIDAR BEHIND D.I.E.T, NEAR DIST. TRAINING CENTER ALIABAD ROAD NAUBAD,BIDAR-585404 KARNATAKAComplaint Case No. CC/52/2021( Date of Filing : 02 Aug 2021 )1. Ramshetty S/o Bheemrao BhadbadeAged: Major occu: Private service R/o: H.No.8-9-1...

Case Number: 52

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2021

|

Date of Upload: 09-01-2023

NCDRC

MANOHAR BURDE V/S CHIEF OFFICER, NAGPUR HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD & 2 ORS.

Development Board  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. C.M. SHROFF & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 796 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 07/02/2019 in Complaint No. 52/2016 of the State Commission Maharashtra)1. CHIEF OFFICER, NAGPUR HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD & 2 ORS.(A MHADA UNIT) VICIL LINES NAGPU...

Case Number: 796

|

Date of Filing: 29-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 27-07-2022

Circuit Bench Nagpur

Shankar Prlhad Bijwe V/S Amravati Housing And Area Development Board Amravati

Development Board  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Adv Sandip Kadu

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURRevision Petition No. RBT/RP/21/6Incc/19/1631. Amravati Housing And Area Development Board AmravatiTq Dist AmravatiAmravatiMaharashtra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Shankar Prlhad BijweE-23/225 Mah...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 21-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2021

Maharashtra

CHIEF OFFICER, NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD NAGPUR V/S SHRI. SANJAY ANNAJI SHAHARE

Development Board  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV. ANURADHA DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/526/2017( Date of Filing : 24 Nov 2017 )1. SHRI. SANJAY ANNAJI SHAHARER/O. PLOT NO 11/A, CHAKRADHAR NAGAR, AYODHYANAGAR, CIMENT...

Case Number: 526

|

Date of Filing: 24-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 12-11-2021

Maharashtra

CHIEF OFFICER, NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD NAGPUR V/S SHRI. SHEKHAR SITARAMJI SHRIPAD

Development Board  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV. ANURADHA DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate ADV. ASHUTOSH P. POTNIS

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/525/2017( Date of Filing : 24 Nov 2017 )1. SHRI. SHEKHAR SITARAMJI SHRIPADR/O. PREM NAGAR, ITWARI RAILWAY STATION, NAGPURNAGPUR...

Case Number: 525

|

Date of Filing: 24-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 12-11-2021

Maharashtra

CHIEF OFFICER, NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD NAGPUR V/S SMT. GIRIJABAI CHIMANRAO KHADGI

Development Board  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV. ANURADHA DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate ADV. SIDDHATH D. KARKARE

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/460/2017( Date of Filing : 27 Oct 2017 )1. SMT. GIRIJABAI CHIMANRAO KHADGIR/O. C/O. SHRI. SUDHAKAR CHIMANRAO KHADGI, SIRSPETH, ...

Case Number: 460

|

Date of Filing: 27-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 14-11-2021

Maharashtra

CHIEF OFFICER, NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD NAGPUR V/S SHRI. VINOD DIGAMBAR HIRURKAR

Development Board  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV. ANURADHA DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate ADV. SIDDHATH D. KARKARE

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/458/2017( Date of Filing : 26 Oct 2017 )1. SHRI. VINOD DIGAMBAR HIRURKARR/O. PLOT NO. 155, AMAR NAGAR, MANEWADA RING ROAD, CHIK...

Case Number: 458

|

Date of Filing: 26-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-10-2021

Maharashtra

CHIEF OFFICER, NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD NAGPUR V/S SHRI. NATHMAL SHRIKISAN AGRAWAL

Development Board  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV. ANURADHA DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate ADV. SIDDHARTH D. KARKARE

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/457/2017( Date of Filing : 26 Oct 2017 )1. SHRI. NATHMAL SHRIKISAN AGRAWALR/O. PLOT NO. 1, NEAR BOUDDHA VIHAR, HIWARI NAGAR, NA...

Case Number: 457

|

Date of Filing: 26-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-10-2021

Maharashtra

CHIEF OFFICER, NAGPUR HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD NAGPUR V/S SHRI. CHANDRAKANT KOLBAJI BAWANKAR

Development Board  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV. ANURADHA DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate ADV. SIDDHARTH D. KARKARE

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/454/2017( Date of Filing : 26 Oct 2017 )1. SHRI. CHANDRAKANT KOLBAJI BAWANKARR/O. PLOT NO. 58, D., DUBE NAGAR, HUDKESHWAR ROAD,...

Case Number: 454

|

Date of Filing: 26-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-10-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Board in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Board ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.