company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S KUMUD RUSTOGI

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II UDYOG SADAN C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/240/2018( Date of Filing : 13 Aug 2018 )1. KUMUD RUSTOGIFLAT NO. 50 PINK APARTMENTS, SECTOR 18/B NEW DELHI 110078...........Com...

Case Number: 240

|

Date of Filing: 13-08-2018

|

Date of Upload: 24-02-2022

Haryana

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . V/S SMT.INDRA SOBTI.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate DALWAR CHAUDHARY.

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA. Execution Application No.:30 of 2018Date of Institution:24.07.2018Date of Decision:18.01.2018Smt. Indra Sobti, w/o Sh. H.K.Sobti, Sobti Nursing Home, Red Road, Kurukshetra. …….Decree Holder...

Case Number: 30

|

Date of Filing: 24-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 19-01-2022

NCDRC

DR. R.M. MALHOTRA & ANR. V/S AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Agra Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KULSHRESHTHA

Respondant Advocate MR. R.K. TEWARI & MITLESH KUMAR PANDEY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 563 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 03/07/2013 in Complaint No. 66/2012 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN, JAIPUR HOUSE LOHA MANDI, AGRA, UTTAR PRA...

Case Number: 563

|

Date of Filing: 05-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 10-01-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Bareilly Development Authority V/S Pramod Kumar Agarwal

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Bhavana Gupta

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Review Application No. RA/73/2021( Date of Filing : 25 Nov 2021 )InFirst Appeal No. R/2009/301. Pramod Kumar AgarwalS/o Sri Prem Prakash Agarwal R/o 3/13 Kesera Line...

Case Number: 73

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2021

|

Date of Upload: 10-01-2022

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S ATUL MARWAHA & 2 ORS.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. FERRY SAFAT

Respondant Advocate MR. PIYUSH HANS

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3960 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1540/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ATUL MARWAHA & 2 ORS.S/o Sh.N.K Marwha House no-204,Phase III-B-1MOHALIPUNJAB2. Anuj Marwaha,S...

Case Number: 3960

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S A K Dubey

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mujeeb Efendi & M.H. Khan

Respondant Advocate S.N. Tiwari

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2000/1786( Date of Filing : 25 Jul 2000 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/06/2000 in Case No. C/1378/1999 of District Lucknow-II)1. A K Dubeya..........

Case Number: 2000

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2000

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Mahendra Shankar Tripathi V/S Unnao Shuklaganj Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Alok Ranjan

Respondant Advocate No. Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2001/2320( Date of Filing : 26 Sep 2001 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Unnao Shuklaganj Development Autho...

Case Number: 2001

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2001

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2022

Karnataka

The commissioner Bangalore Development Authority V/S Mr. M Sundara Ram

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate Sri. S.Y. Kumar

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 8TH FLOOR, B.W.S.S.B BUILDING, K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE-09Complaint Case No. CC/578/2020( Date of Filing : 31 Aug 2020 )1. Shri. K.S. KunalS/o K.R. Shivanandaswamy, Aged about 26 Years,No.1/1, Flat No.B-4,1st Floor, C S R Elegance Apartm...

Case Number: 580

|

Date of Filing: 31-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 31-12-2021

Karnataka

The commissioner Bangalore Development Authority V/S Shri Shekharappa G Doddamani

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate Sri. S.Y. Kumar

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 8TH FLOOR, B.W.S.S.B BUILDING, K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE-09Complaint Case No. CC/578/2020( Date of Filing : 31 Aug 2020 )1. Shri. K.S. KunalS/o K.R. Shivanandaswamy, Aged about 26 Years,No.1/1, Flat No.B-4,1st Floor, C S R Elegance Apartm...

Case Number: 581

|

Date of Filing: 31-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 31-12-2021

Karnataka

The commissioner Bangalore Development Authority V/S Shri Honnaiah

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate Sri. S.Y. Kumar

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 8TH FLOOR, B.W.S.S.B BUILDING, K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE-09Complaint Case No. CC/578/2020( Date of Filing : 31 Aug 2020 )1. Shri. K.S. KunalS/o K.R. Shivanandaswamy, Aged about 26 Years,No.1/1, Flat No.B-4,1st Floor, C S R Elegance Apartm...

Case Number: 582

|

Date of Filing: 31-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 31-12-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.