company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S KRISHNA DEVI

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II UDYOG SADAN C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/38/2015( Date of Filing : 04 Feb 2015 )1. KRISHNA DEVIA-1/35 2ND FLOOR JANAKPURI NEW DLEHI 110058...........Complainant(s)Versu...

Case Number: 38

|

Date of Filing: 04-02-2015

|

Date of Upload: 08-06-2022

Uttar Pradesh

R. S. Gandhi V/S Bareilly Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Deepak Mehrotra & V.P. Srivastava

Respondant Advocate Umesh Kumar Sharma.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/3288( Date of Filing : 08 Dec 2003 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Bareilly Development AuthorityA......

Case Number: 2003

|

Date of Filing: 08-12-2003

|

Date of Upload: 25-05-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Smt Arpana Srivastav V/S Gorakhpur Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S C Tiwari

Respondant Advocate R K Mishra

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2006/1344( Date of Filing : 31 May 2006 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Gorakhpur Development Authority a...........Appell...

Case Number: 2006

|

Date of Filing: 31-05-2006

|

Date of Upload: 25-05-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Atul Kumar Verma V/S Allahbad Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate D Mehrotra

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2007/1080( Date of Filing : 21 May 2007 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Allahbad Development Authority Allahbad..............

Case Number: 2007

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2007

|

Date of Upload: 25-05-2022

West Bengal

Director of Finance, Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) V/S Sudheer Kumar Shastri, S/O S.L. Shastri

Development Authority   Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority  

Court Name: Rajarhat

Appelant Advocate In-person/

Respondant Advocate Mr. Sourish Kumar Biswas

Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd FloorPremises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/158/20201. Sudheer Kumar Shastri, S/O S.L...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 17-03-2020

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2023

Punjab

Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA) V/S Sanju garg

Development Authority   Punjab Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate Sh Badri Narian Goyal

Respondant Advocate Sh Amit Singla

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABExecution Application No. EA/20/5( Date of Filing : 16 Jun 2020 )InComplaint Case No. CC/17/1201. Sanju gargS/o Atma Ram r/o Shop No. 42, Anaj Mandi, BaretaMansaPunjab...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Punjab Urban Developmen...

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 16-06-2020

|

Date of Upload: 23-05-2022

Maharashtra

MAHARASHTRA HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHRI PADMAKAR PRAKASH KANFADE

Development Authority  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV. PRAFUL KATARIYA

Respondant Advocate

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,NAGPURNew Administrative Building No.-13rd Floor, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440001Ph.0712-2546884Complaint Case No. CC/22/6( Date of Filing : 10 Jan 2022 )1. SHRI PADMAKAR PRAKASH KANFADEQTR. NO. 26, 47/60, NEAR LANJEWAR KIRANA STOR...

Case Number: 22

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-2022

|

Date of Upload: 18-05-2022

NCDRC

MR. TAPAN KUMAR NEOGI V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. AZHAR QAYUM & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate M/S. JAIN & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 642 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 14/05/2020 in Complaint No. 400/2019 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADANNEW DELHI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MR. TAPAN KUMAR NEOGI...

Case Number: 642

|

Date of Filing: 27-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 06-06-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Vivek Kumar Saraswat V/S Mathura vrindavan development authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate N.C. Upadhyay

Respondant Advocate Puneet Sahai Bisaria

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/86/2019( Date of Filing : 17 Jan 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/12/2018 in Case No. CC/218/2012 of District Mathura)1. Mathura vrindavan deve...

Case Number: 85

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 06-05-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Ramesh Chandra Sharma V/S Mathura vrindavan development authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate N.C. Upadhyay

Respondant Advocate Puneet Sahai bisaria

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/86/2019( Date of Filing : 17 Jan 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/12/2018 in Case No. CC/218/2012 of District Mathura)1. Mathura vrindavan deve...

Case Number: 86

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 06-05-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.