company-name-logo

Construction

Latest Judgments

Total 8308 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.

Maharashtra

MORYA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD THROUGH SHRI SUNIL MARUTI DHOLI V/S UMESH SUBHASH POTDAR

Maruti   Construction  

Court Name: Nashik

Appelant Advocate ADV NILAM AHIRE

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 595

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2023

|

Date of Upload: 23-10-2024

Maharashtra

MORYA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD THROUGH SHRI SUNIL MARUTI DHOLI V/S SHRI ANIL SAHEBRAO AAHER

Maruti   Construction  

Court Name: Nashik

Appelant Advocate ADV NILAM AHIRE

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 594

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2023

|

Date of Upload: 23-10-2024

Maharashtra

M/S CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION & OTHERS V/S SHRI RAHUL SUDHAKARRAO CHAUDHARY

Construction  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Nagpur

Appelant Advocate ADV LEKHRAJ KHINCHI

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 24

|

Date of Filing: 14-08-2024

|

Date of Upload: 23-10-2024

West Bengal

Sri Dipankar Sarkar, partner of M/s. Rupayan Construction V/S SMT. IRA MAITRA

Construction  

Court Name: Howrah

Appelant Advocate Sujit Bhattacharya, Rekha Bhattacharya

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, P.O. and P.S. Howrah, Dist. Howrah-711 101.Office (033) 2638 0892, 0512 Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892Complaint Case No. CC/186/2024( Date of Filing : 19 Sep 2024 )1. SMT. IRA MAITRAW/o. Suni...

Case Number: 186

|

Date of Filing: 19-09-2024

|

Date of Upload: 22-10-2024

Haryana

The Branch Manager, Indusind Bank Ltd. V/S Goyat Construction Company

Construction   Indusind Bank  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Pardeep Goyat

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/24/439( Date of Filing : 18 Sep 2024 )1. Goyat Construction CompanyMeham, Tehsil Meham, Distt. Rohtak through its Prop. Sahil Goyat S/o Suresh, agd 29 years R/o Kishangarh, Tehsil Meham, Distt. ...

Case Number: 24

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2024

|

Date of Upload: 21-10-2024

Maharashtra

Hasmukh Sohanraj Rathod on behalf of Arihant Construction V/S Bharat Haribhau Kakade

Construction  

Court Name: Raigad

Appelant Advocate Prajakta Mali

Respondant Advocate Gajanan Pawar

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 18-10-2024

NCDRC

M/S. SRI NAKODA CONSTRUCTION LIMITED & ORS. V/S AMBUJ SHUKLA

Construction  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate S.K. VERMA

Respondant Advocate MR. VIDUR BHATIA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 627 OF 2024(Against the Order dated 12/12/2023 in Complaint No. CC/226/2022 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. AMBUJ SHUKLAS/O MR. SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA R/O D-601, VALMARK ORCHARD SQUARE, KOTHNUR MAIN ROAD...

Case Number: 627

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2024

|

Date of Upload: 23-10-2024

Uttar Pradesh

TATA Hitachi Construction Machinery Co.Pvt.Ltd. And Others V/S M/s Indore Hyderabad Transport Company

Tata Hitachi   Tata   Construction   Transport   Hitachi  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate Subodh Kumar Tyagi

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1007

|

Date of Filing: 27-10-2021

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2024

Kerala

MANAGING DIRECTOR HEERA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Pvt.Ltd V/S M L MAHESH

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate C S RAJMOHAN

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONTHIRUVANANTHAPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/16/111( Date of Filing : 01 Oct 2016 )1. M L MAHESHPARAMESWARA KNRA 42 T C 17/1516 4 KAILAS NAGAR POOJAPPURA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695012...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGING DIRECTOR HEERA CONS...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 01-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-10-2024

Karnataka

Sri Saji Pradeesh, Prorietor Shiva Construction V/S Sri B.A lava

Construction  

Court Name: Kodagu

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate Exparty

Case Number: 57

|

Date of Filing: 19-08-2024

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2024

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.