Clinic
Latest Judgments
Total 966 Consumer Court Cases Against Clinic.
Institute of Clinical Research (India) V/S Mr. Amruta Mohanty
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate IP
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/325/20111. Mr. Amruta Mohanty227, Himagiri Meadows, Gottigere, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore-83 BEFORE: PRESENT: ORDERDate of Filing: 19.02.2011Date of Order: 13.05.2011BEFORE THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SESHADRIPURAM BANGAL...
Case Number: 325
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Chairman,Institute of Clinical Recerch( India) V/S Ku Humeshwari Dattatrya Nipane
Court Name: Bhandara
Appelant Advocate M S Potdhuke
Respondant Advocate
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTDISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BHANDARACONSUMER CASE NO. 11 of 2 1. Ku Humeshwari Dattatrya NipaneC/o Dattatrya M Nipane Ram Mandir Ward BhandaraBhandaraMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Chairman,Institute of Clinical Recerch( India) 242-A , 13 ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SHRI AMIT SHARMA AND ORS. V/S MARIE STOPES CLINIC AND ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate RAJEEV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4063 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 29/09/2006 in Appeal No. 839/2004 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MARIE STOPES CLINIC AND ANR............Petitioner(s)Versus1. SHRI AMIT SHARMA AND ORS...............
Case Number: 4063
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2011
Dr. Batra Heomopathy Clinic V/S Ganesh Verma
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 755 of 2010 1. Ganesh VermaS/o Shiv Parsad Verma R/o House No. 2222, Sector-22/C, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Dr. Batra Heomopathy Clini...
Case Number: 755
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Asian Speech And Hearing Clinic, Dr. Amitbhai, Dr. Sukhlecha V/S JagdishChandra Narandas Chothani
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate R.B.Sejpal
Respondant Advocate M.P.Upadhyay
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2020
MATOSHREE POLYCLINIC HOSPITAL PATAN V/S RAVAL BHIKHABHAI GANESHBHAI
Court Name: Patan
Appelant Advocate C.V.DESAI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2020
M/s The Body Care Slimming and Beauty Clinic for men and Women V/S Mrs.Tara, Aged about 57 Years, Wife of Mr. Shantilal P. Shah
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Mr.K.N. Krishna Rao
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/10/21261. Mrs.Tara, Aged about 57 Years, Wife of Mr. Shantilal P. ShahPresently at G1, Vastu Nirvana Apartment, ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SURYA CLINIC V/S SMT NAGMA BEE
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate ABDUL MATEEN ADV
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2016
M/s Ramadas Clinic and Nursing Home V/S K.Vijayakumari
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.S.Kalkura
Respondant Advocate M.K.George
Complaint Case No. CC/04/41. K.VijayakumariSasi Nivas,Anamangad,Malappuram BEFORE:HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT PRESENT: ORDERKERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMOP.4/20024JUDGMENT DATED:5..2..2011PRESENTJUSTIC...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SMT. GUDDI BAI V/S MARIE STOPS CLINIC AND ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate RAJEEV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 302 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 17/10/2006 in Appeal No. 1684/2006 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. MARIE STOPS CLINIC AND ANR.THOURGH ITS , CILINCE INCHARGE , SUITE NO , 3.4.5. SHAH BHAVA...
Case Number: 302
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2007
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2011
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Clinic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Clinic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Clinic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.