Clinic
Latest Judgments
Total 966 Consumer Court Cases Against Clinic.
M.D., Clinical Research Education & Management Academy (CREMA) V/S Mr. N. Nagashankar
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate PUSHKAR PATANKAR
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. CC/10/281 1. Mr. N. NagashankarAF2,Shree Cauvary Karpaga No.9, Vedhagiri Street, Alandur, ChennaiMaharastra .......
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kerala Water Authority, Water works,PH Divisin, Kannur V/S Dr.E.D.Joseph,Clinical Psychologist,Sadgamaya,P.O.Pallikkunnu.
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNURComplaint Case No. CC/09/2081. Dr.E.D.Joseph,Clinical Psychologist,Sadgamaya,P.O.Pallikkunnu.Dr.E.D.Joseph,Clinical Psychologist,Sadgamaya,P.O.Pallikkunnu.Kerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kerala Water Authority, Water works,P...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 29-02-2016
Dental Care Clinic V/S Smt. Rajwinder Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Smt. Rajwinder Kaur, appellant in person
Respondant Advocate Sh. Amit Rajan, Adv. for respondents alongwith Dr. Gurvinder Singh, respondent no. 2 in person
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 59 of 2010 1. Smt. Rajwinder KaurW/o Sh. Jasdev Singh, R/o # 25, Sector 18-A, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Dental Care...
Case Number: 59
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
NEERAJ CLINIC PVT. LTD. V/S MANJEET KUMAR SHARMA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. AMITA GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 354 OF 2003(Against the Order dated 20/05/2003 in Complaint No. of the State Commission Haryana)1. MANJEET KUMAR SHARMAS/o :SH. DHANI RAM SHARMA, HOUSE NO.302, SECTOR-17,PANCHKULAHARYANA...........Appellant...
Case Number: 354
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2003
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2011
Dr. Batra positive helth clinic pvt. ltd. ors V/S Ms. Sangeeta L. Kanojia
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Ravindra tandekar
Complaint Case No. CC/08/771. Ms. Sangeeta L. Kanojia5/40,shree sadam Bldg. 10c lata nigam road colaba market,colabaMumbai-5Maharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dr. Batra positive helth clinic pvt. ltd. ors1-A kakad house,1st flr,opp. liberty cinema marine linesMumbai-2Mah...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Principal Clinical Research Education & Management Academy V/S Chetan Dinkar Joshi
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. CC/09/69 1. Chetan Dinkar JoshiA-11, Nav Surya Prabha, Murar Road,Mulund-West, Mumbai-80Maharastra ...........Ap...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Eveland Clinic (Pvt) Ltd. V/S Sanjoy Choudhury.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Gouranga Gupta Roy. Mr. Priyankar Deb Sarkar.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Koyeli Mukhopadhyay.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGALBHABANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027FA No: 496 Of 2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/07/2010 in Case No. 49/2009 of District Jalpaiguri DF , Jalpaiguri)1. Sanjoy Choudhury.S/o Rabindra Nath Choudhury...
Case Number: 496
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
RAVI DENTAL CLINIC V/S RANCHODBHAI GALABHAI VAGHELA
Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate SELF
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2021
Kosturi Ultra Sound Clinic V/S Smt. Sarita Bothra
Court Name: Cooch Behar
Appelant Advocate Sri Shyama Prasad Sehanabish
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Clinic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Clinic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Clinic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.