
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate M.KHAN
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/47/20111. RAMESH T. DIWETEC 7 BSNL QUATERS AURANGABADMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96 B WITH 9TH FLR. MITTAL TOWERMUMBAI 21MAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT Shri S.S. P...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 178 Of 20111. HRISHIKESH, S/O PRASHANT DESHMUKHPRATHMESH, HETKAR ALI TQ, KARJATRAIGADMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. H...
Case Number: 178
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 177 Of 20111. VAISHALI MAHENDRA NIRBHAVANECHANDRAMANI NAGAR, PENDHARKAR COLONY,JAIL ROAD,NASHIKMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B...
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 176 Of 20111. PRASHANT G DESHMUKHPRATHMESH, HETKAR ALI TQ, KARJATRAIGADMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESI...
Case Number: 176
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 175 Of 20111. NAMRATA SANTOSH NIRBHAVANECHANDRAMANI NAGAR,PENDHARKAR COLONY,JAIL ROADNASHIKMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR,MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUM...
Case Number: 175
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 174 Of 20111. KALPANA BHASKAR BRAMHANE102 DEVI AMBIKA CO-OP SOCIETY,1ST FLOOR,SHIV GANGA NAGARAMBARNATHMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9 TH FLOOR,MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. ...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate M.KHAN
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/45/20111. NAWARAS JALIL2/1/16/1 JUBILEE PARKAURANGABADMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96 B WITH 9TH FLR. MITTAL TOWERMIMBAI 21MAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT Shri S.S. ...
Case Number: 45
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate M.KHAN
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/46/20111. M.Z.M.SIDDIQUE2/1/16/1/ JUBILEE PARK AURANGABADMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96 B WITH 9TH FLR. MITTAL TOWERMUMBAI 21MAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT Shri S....
Case Number: 46
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate M.KHAN
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/48/20111. RMKRISHANA K. GANDE842 N 5 SAHYADRI NAGR. AURANGABADMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96 B WITH 9TH FLR. MITTAL TOWERMUMBAI21MAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT Shr...
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate M.KHAN
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/49/20111. RAMESH T. DIWETEC 7 BSNL QUATERSAURANGABADMAHARAHSTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96 B WITH 9TH FLR. MITTAL TOWERMUMBAI 21MAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT Shri S.S. Pa...
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against City Realcom in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against City Realcom ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against City Realcom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.