
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 170 Of 20111. N.R.ZALTESHIV GANGA AMBARNATHTHANEMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTDMITTAL TOWER, NARIMAN POINT,MUMBAI-21MAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Satyashil M. Ratnakar PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. G.H. Rathod MEMBER PRESENT...
Case Number: 170
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 179 Of 20111. VEENA ASHOK KASAVSAPTUSHRUNGI NAGAR,DANI KIRAN APT, OLD SAIKHETD ROAD, JAIL ROADNASHIKMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHR...
Case Number: 179
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 187 Of 20111. SANGEETA KRISHNA NIRBHAVANEHARI OM APT,1ST FLOOR,SUBHASH TEKDI ROAD,ROOM NO 102,ULHAS NAGARTHANEMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'AB...
Case Number: 187
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 186 Of 20111. SMITA GANESH DESHMUKHPRATHMESH, HETKER ALI TA,KARJATRAIGADMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRES...
Case Number: 186
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 185 Of 20111. BALLAL RAMESH JOSHINATHKRUPA, BRHAMINALI NERUL,TA KARJATRAIGADMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE ...
Case Number: 185
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 184 Of 20111. KEYUR R MEHTASURBHI, CHS 329/43, PANT NAGAR,GHATKOPARMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRE...
Case Number: 184
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 183 Of 20111. NISHANT R MEHTASURBHIM CHS 329/43, PANT NAGAR, GHATKOPAR-EASTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONOR...
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 182 Of 20111. RMESH RAMCHANDRA JOSHINATHKRUPA, BRHAMINALI, NETUL, TA,KARJATRAIGADMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONOR...
Case Number: 182
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 181 Of 20111. PRADNYA P DESHMUKHPRATHMESH, HETKAR ALI TQ, KARJATRAIGADMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESID...
Case Number: 181
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. MOHSIN KHAN
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 180 Of 20111. VAISHALI MEHENDRA NIRBHAVANECHANDRAMANI NAGAR, PENDHARKAR COLONY, JAIL ROADNASHIKMAHARSHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CITY REALCOM LTD96-B WING,9TH FLOOR, MITTAL TOWER,NARIMAN POINTMUMBAIMAHARASHTR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.D...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against City Realcom in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against City Realcom ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against City Realcom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.