
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate DEEPAK GIROTRA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.219 of 2015 Date of Institution: 11.12.2015 Date of Decision: 25.04.2017Vijay Devi W/o Sh.Nand Kishore R/o 915/18, Gani Pura, Rohtak, Haryana through her husband Sh.Nand Kishore S/o Sh.Daya Kishan bei...
Case Number: 219
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ROHIT GOSWAMI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.29 of 2015 Date of Institution: 30.03.2015 Date of Decision: 07.04.2017Shweta Sharma W/o Mr. Satydev Kaushik R/o Flat NO.102, Gukul Apartments, Sector-45, Faridabad-121010.…..ComplainantVersusM...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate HEMANT SAINI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 524 of 2016Date of Institution: 09.06.2016Date of Decision : 17.03.2017Director, M/s BPTP Limited, Corporate Office at: BPTP Crest, Plot No.15, Udyog Vihar, Phase IV, Gurgaon. Appellant-Opposite Par...
Case Number: 524
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ARUN GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 83 of 2015 Date of the Institution: 21.05.2015 Date of Decision: 16.03.20171. Ayushi Sharma D/o Shri Ravi Mohan Sharma, R/o # 39/9, 1st Floor, Shakti Nagar, Delhi-110007.2. Akriti Sharma D/o Shri R...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SHARAN SETHI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 86 of 2015 Date of the Institution: 22.05.2015 Date of Decision: 16.03.2017Radhika Tandon D/o late Shri Mathura Das Tandon, R/o 4 Binstead Close, Hayes, Middlesex UK and C/o Sharan Sethi, Advocate,...
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate JATIN DHAWAN
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 07.03.2017 Date of Decision: 14.03.2017Complaint No. 256/2017In the matter of:Anju Kaul w/o Umesh KaulThrough Power of Attorney HolderMs. Rita Jan W/o Ajay JanR/o...
Case Number: 256
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NARENDER KAAJLA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 91 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 27.01.2017 Date of Decision: 07.03.2017Anil Saxena-Customer Code No.104707 son of Shri I.N. Saxena, resident of G-12/10, Gali No.5, Brahmpuri, Ghonda, Delhi-11...
Case Number: 91
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision:02.03.2017Complaint Case No.74/2015In the matter of:Shri Dayanand ParasharS/o Late Shri Kishan Lal Parashar,Mrs. Santosh Parashar,W/o Dr. Dayanand ParasharBoth R/o 20/7...
Case Number: 74
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate HEMANT SAINI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 639 of 2015Date of Institution: 30.07.2015 Date of Decision: 02.03.2017BPTP Limited, M-11, Middle Circle, Connaught Circus, New Delhi-110001 through its Authorized Representative Mr. Vipin Saroh...
Case Number: 639
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. DEEPTI RAJPAL, MR. SHIKHAR GARG, MR. GANESH BAPU TR & MR. RAVI KANT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 270 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 19/02/2016 in Complaint No. 68/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BPTP LIMITEDM-11, MIDLLE CIRCL;E, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI-110001...........Appellant(s)Versus1. NA...
Case Number: 270
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bptp in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bptp ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bptp under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.