
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Mandeep Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application No. 66 OF 2019in CC/448/2018M/s Midas and Company Vs Bharti Airtel Ltd. BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: None for Complainant.Sh.Ga...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 807 OF 20191. SIMHA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER For the Complainant :In person For the Opp.Pa...
Case Number: 807
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2019
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate Sri.H.K Vikram,
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DIST.CONSUMERDISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,8TH FLOOR,BWSSB BLDG.K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE560 009Complaint Case No. cc/13/970( Date of Filing : 20 May 2013 )1. Sri.Anand Raj,S/o U.D Ramu, Resident at No.11, C/o Lakshmamma , 6th Cross, 2nd Main Road, Vittal Nagar, Chamarajpet, ...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 20-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2019
Court Name: Moga
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajneesh Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh.M.L.Chugh
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX,ROOM NOS. B209-B214, BEAS BLOCK, MOGAComplaint Case No. CC/18/20( Date of Filing : 27 Mar 2018 )1. Vinay KashyapAdvocate, aged 60 years s/o Sh. Dev Pal Kashyap, Basant Singh Road, MogaMogaPunjab.............
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2019
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate ADV. A. T. SAWAL
Respondant Advocate ADV. DEVENDRA JAISWAL
...
Case Number: 379
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2019
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Balwinder Singh Saini
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/392/2018( Date of Filing : 24 Sep 2018 )1. Kamaljit Singh S/o Sh. Sampuran SinghR/o Hno.488, Guru Teg Bahadur Nagar, Near Gh...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2019
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ravi Inder Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application No. 64 OF 2019in CC/865/2017Vineet Krishan Vs Bharti Airtel Limited BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Ajay Sharma, Counsel for Co...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2019
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Amit Beri
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/468/2018( Date of Filing : 12 Nov 2018 )1. Kewal Krishan aged about 40 YearsS/o Sh. Gopal Krishan R/o 467, Makhdoompura, Jal...
Case Number: 468
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2019
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/97/2018( Date of Filing : 06 Dec 2018 )InComplaint Case No. CC/170/20171. Amit Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Surinder Kumar R...
Case Number: 97
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Vikram Singh
Respondant Advocate Akshat Sharma
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.322 of 2017 Date of instt. 26.09.2017 Date of decision:13.02.2019Vikram Singh son of Shri Rameshwar Nand resident of 33-A Chaman Garden, Karnal. …….Complainant Versus1.Bharti Airtel Ltd. P...
Case Number: 322
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharti Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharti Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharti Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.