
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 470 OF 2022Des Raj Vs Bharti Airtel Limited BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: None for Complainant.Dated : 26th May 2022ORDER Complaint was receive...
Case Number: 470
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2022
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2022
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-III (WEST)C-150-151, COMMUNITY CENTRE, JANAKPURI,NEW DELHI-110058NATIONAL LOK ADALAT : 14.05.2022EXECUTION CASE NO. M/8867/20/695/17 Date of order: 14.05.2022PARVEEN KUMAR SETH V/S BHARTI AIRTEL & ANR.Present :- Complainant in...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-2020
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. S.S. Das & Assoc.
Respondant Advocate M/s. H. Mishra & assoc.
IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONODISHA, CUTTACKFirst Appeal No. CC/1/2008( Date of Filing : 02 Jan 2008 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Mrs. Nita Das, W/o- Sourya Sundar Das, Mukur Press, Premisses, Bhashakosh Lane, Chandinichowk, Cuttac...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 04-11-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. S.S. Das & Assoc.
Respondant Advocate M/s. H. Mishra & Assoc.
IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONODISHA, CUTTACKComplaint Case No. CC/01/2008( Date of Filing : 02 Jan 2008 )1. Mrs. Nita DasW/o: Sourya Sundar Das, At: Mukur Press Premises, Bhashakosh Lane, Nimchouri, P.O: Chandinichowk, Dist.: Cuttack...........Complainant(s)...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2022
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Rakesh mangla
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, Court Room No.19, Block-C,Judicial Court Complex, BATHINDA-151001 (PUNJAB)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/18/328( Date of Filing : 30 Nov 2018 )1. Gundeep Bansalaged about 30 years s/o sh. Manohar lal Bansal,advocate r/o 15...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 46
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2022
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suchita Singh & Tilotma Sharma
Respondant Advocate Ashish Mishra & Prashant Kumar & Rajeev Srivastava & Ashish Mishra & Rahul Kapoor
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/146/2014( Date of Filing : 16 Oct 2014 )1. Nissin ABC Loristics Pvt LtdKolkata...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bharti Airtel LtdNewDelhi.........
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2022
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Pabbi, Adv.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:942 of 2019Date of Institution:17.09.2019Date of Decision:15.03.2022Anil Kumar Aggarwal, House NO.742, Sector 7-B, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersusBharti Airtel Limited, through its CEO...
Case Number: 942
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2022
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Tanvir Alam
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/27/2020( Date of Filing : 22 Jan 2020 )1. Syed Hossain Imam3, Canal Street,P.O.Entally, P.S. Entally, Kolkata-700014............Co...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjiv Pabbi Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T. CHANDIGARH[1]Appeal No.:A/271/2019Date of Institution:14/11/2019Date of Decision:28/02/20221. Bharti Airtel Limited, through its Managing Director, having its Regd. Office at Bharti Crescent 1, Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, P...
Case Number: 271
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharti Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharti Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharti Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.