
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/381. V.SADASIVAN PILLAIS/O .K.VELAPPAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT 8 A, AMBADY, PANTHIYIL, WARRIAM ROAD,COCHIN 16, WHO HAD LAND LINE NO. 2385191 AND CUSTOMER ID 6322973...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BSNL, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD,ERNAKULAM TELECOMMUNICATIONS, ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MRS. N.V.MASURKAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/04/1008(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. First Appeal No. of District Thane)1. PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.TELEPHONE BHAVAN, KALA TALO, KALYAN-...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4729 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 19/11/2009 in Appeal No. 78/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KASHMIRI DEVINadalpura H. No. 193, Near Devi Mandir, KhurjaBulandsaharUttar Pradesh..........
Case Number: 4729
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2011
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NEETA MASURKAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/721(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/06/2010 in Case No. 146/09 of District Ratnagiri)1. GENERAL MANAGER BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTDRATNAGIRI SANCHAR BHAVAN KHREGHAT ROAD OPP CIVIL ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Suresh Suresh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR.K.MOHAN
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/295/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Prakasam)1. M/S BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITEDREP.BY THE TELECOM DISTRICT MANAGER, PRAKASAM DIS. OFFICE AT RAM NAGAR, ONGOLE,PRAKASAMAndhra Pradesh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MR.DUBBAGUNTA SURESH ...
Case Number: 295
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Guntur
Appelant Advocate Sri P. Venkateswarlu
Respondant Advocate Sri K. B. Prasad
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGUNTURComplaint Case No. CC/123/20101. Mrs. Krosuri Sreeravamma, AND othersResidents of Teppali Jagannadha, DNo.11-29-1/1, Ramireddypet Narasaraopet. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. A Hazarath Rao PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. SMT T. SUNEETHA, M.S.W., B.L., MEMBERHONO...
Case Number: 123
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Tanna
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/01/1671(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Rakesh Dube State bank road , WANI dIst. Yavat...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2001
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adv U.R.Tanna
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/2006/25(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/11/2005 in Case No. A/05/86 of District )1. The General Manager (Telecom) Bh...
Case Number: 2006
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. V.N. RAGHUPATHY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 169 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 13/07/2010 in Appeal No. 339/2010 of the State Commission Kerala)1. M. SANKARANARAYANA BHATS/o. Ganpathy Bhat, Megasale in Koliyoor Village, Kasargod, Kasargod Taluk...
Case Number: 169
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2011
Court Name: Nanded
Appelant Advocate A.B.Karva
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Reddressal Forum , NandedDistrict Consumer Forum , Visava Nagar, V.I.P. Road, NandedComplaint Case No. CC/10/257 1. Shayamsundar Madanlal Sarda Hadgaon Tq.HadgaonNandedMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.Opposite Collector Offic...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharat Sanchar Nigam in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharat Sanchar Nigam ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharat Sanchar Nigam under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.