
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate DHRUV SIHAG
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA,PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No.955 of 2016Date of Institution:10.10.2016 Date of Decision: 29.08.2018United India Insurance Company Limited, Regional office SCO No.123-124, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh through its Deputy Manager (Consume...
Case Number: 503
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAMAN SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,HARYANA,PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No.955 of 2016Date of Institution:10.10.2016 Date of Decision: 29.08.2018United India Insurance Company Limited, Regional officeSCONo.123-124, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh through its Deputy Manager (Consumer),...
Case Number: 46
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-10-2018
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate G.S. Ahluwalia
Respondant Advocate K.C.Jain
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA Consumer Complaint No.: 89 of 2016Date of Institution: 11.02.2016Date of Decision: 20.03.2018Shyam Singh S/o Sh. Mehar Singh R/o Ward No.1, House No.616, Bank Colony, Hussaini Road, Naraingarh, District Ambala. .........
Case Number: 89
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2018
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
The counsel for OP No.1 has paid Rs.2200/- in cash to the complainant towards full and final settlement of the dispute, which has been duly received by him. In this view of the matter the complainant wants to withdraw the complainant. In this regard he has appended a note on the ...
Case Number: 315
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL K. BATRA & MR. PRINS KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MR. UMESH NAGPAL, MR. PANKAJ SHARMA & MR. LOKESH BHARGAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3945 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/08/2013 in Appeal No. 136/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.THROUGH ITS TERRITORY MANAGER, (LPG) ROAD NO-14, V.K.I. AREA...
Case Number: 3945
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2017
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate K.C.JAIN
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AMBALA. Complaint Case No.: 190 of 2014Date of Institution : 23.07.2014Date of Decision : 24-04-2017Rajnish Kumar son of Sh. Ram Lagan alias Ram Lakhan, resident of House No. 31, Indira Colony, Jandli, Ambala City, Tehsil and...
Case Number: 190
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 16/08/2016 in Appeal No. 668/2014 of the State Commission Punjab)1. MADAN LALS/O. OM PRAKASH JAIN, R/O. H.NO. 20204, GALI NO. 18, PARINDA ROAD, GURU TEGH BAHADUR NA...
Case Number: 3383
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANOJ SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. BHOLA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 383 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 05/12/2008 in Appeal No. 816/2008 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISESThroug Its Prop. Mrs. Veena Chaudhry WZ-80, Pankha Road , Nangal Raya ...
Case Number: 384
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2016
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Amit Kumar Walia
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 111 Instituted on: 10.03.2015 Decided on: 22.03.2016Nazir Khan aged about 60 years son of Ronak Khan, resident of H.No.111, VPO Amargarh, Tehsil Malerkotla, Distt. Sangrur. ..Complainant Versus1. Lalru LPG Terri...
Case Number: 111
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MANINDER SINGH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. First Appeal No.819 of 2015 Date of Institution: 28.09.2015 Date of Decision: 16.10.20151. Surinder Kaur W/o Sh.Mohinder Singh2. Mohinder Singh son of Sh.Charan Singh, both residents of Durga Nagar, Ambala City.&...
Case Number: 819
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bharat Petroleum in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bharat Petroleum ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bharat Petroleum under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.