
Address: Bharti Telemedia Limited Plot No 16,Udhyog Vihar, Phase IV, Airtel Center Gurgaon 122015 Haryana, India.
Email ID: customercare@airtel.com
Phone No: 121
Website : https://www.airtel.in/
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
SHRI RAM N. SHARMA VS. AITEL RELATIOSHIP CENTRE24.09.2021EX/81/2019Pr. Decree Holder in person.Joint application moved for settlement and withdrawal of the case.It is stated that parties have amicably settled the dispute and JD is making payment of Rs....
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 24-09-2021
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
SHRI RAM N. SHARMA VS. AITEL RELATIOSHIP CENTRE24.09.2021EX/82/2019Pr. Decree Holder in person.Joint application moved for settlement and withdrawal of the case.It is stated that parties have amicably settled the dispute and JD is making payment of Rs.5...
Case Number: 82
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 24-09-2021
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, Court Room No.19, Block-C,Judicial Court Complex, BATHINDA-151001 (PUNJAB)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/19/189( Date of Filing : 26 Jul 2019 )1. Ashok Kumarst no.5,# no.574,Nai Abadi,Abohar,Fazilka...........Complainant(s)Vers...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2021
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Khanna
Respondant Advocate
Before the National Lok Adalat held in District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., ChandigarhCONSUMER COMPLAINT No. 438 OF 2020Deepak Suri Vs Bharti Airtel India Ltd. BEFORE: RAJAN DEWAN, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER RAMAN MOHINDER, MEMBER-NATIONAL LOK ADALATPRESE...
Case Number: 438
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2020
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2021
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate KESHAV GUPTA ,STUTI BAMBA,ANNA BANSAL & AASHISH BHAGAT.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA. Execution Application No.:17 of 2020Date of Institution:25.11.2020Date of Decision:09.09.2021Prem Chand Sharma, aged 64 years, S/o Shri Dhani Ram Sharma, R/o House No.1518, Sector-21, Panchkula. …&he...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2020
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2021
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/18/279( Date of Filing : 07 Jul 2018 )1. ABDUL MANAF ILLIMUTTIL H PAZHACKAPILLY MUVATTUPUZHA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. AIRTEL REP BY GRIEVANCE OFFICER TARUN TOWER GRD FLR SA RD KOCHI-16............O...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2022
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Ram Lal Bilam
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No.673 of 2019 Date of instt. 27.09.2019 Date of Decision: 16.04.2021Varinder Singh son of Satpal Singh, resident of H.No.129, Sector-6, Urban Estate, Karnal. …….Complainant ...
Case Number: 673
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P. Chandra
Respondant Advocate C K Seth
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/1998/39( Date of Filing : 20 Apr 1998 )1. Mr. Prashant Chandraa...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Airtel Bharti Cellular Ltd.a............Opp.Par...
Case Number: 1998
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-1998
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2021
Court Name: Hyderabad
Appelant Advocate V.Sharath Kumar
Respondant Advocate M/s.Gopi Rajesh & Associates
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM I HYDERABAD(9th Floor, Chandravihar Complex, M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001)Complaint Case No. CC/311/2018( Date of Filing : 16 Aug 2018 )1. Naveed Junaid Mohammed Khan (Naveed Khan)S/o Niyaz Mohammed Khan, Age 33 year...
Case Number: 311
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2021
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate Ramneek Sharma
CC No.339 of 2020.Ankit vs. Bharti Airtel.Present: None for complainant. Sh.Ramneek Sharma, Adv. for respondent. This complaint has been called several times since morning, but the complainant failed to appear before this Commission, either in person or through any Advoca...
Case Number: 339
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2020
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2021
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Airtel in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Airtel ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Airtel under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.