
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. V. BALAJI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 495 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 26/09/2011 in Complaint No. 30/2008 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. MARUDHAMUTHU VARADHARAJAN56/6, Rasi Colony, Panchiyappa Street, Kumbakonam-612001...........Appe...
Case Number: 495
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2013
Airport Authority Of India Airport
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV MEHTA
Respondant Advocate MR. DIGVIJAY RAIM
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 167 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 13/02/2006 in Complaint No. 336/1994 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SAROJ DIKSHA AND ORS.7/2 , ROOP NAGAR DELHI-110007 -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT...
Case Number: 167
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2013
Court Name: Alappuzha
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Airport Authority Of India Airport
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHISH DHOLAKIA, Advocate
Respondant Advocate MS. RAMEEZA HAKEEM
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 81 OF 20011. GEETA JETHANI & ORS.-...........Complainant(s)Versus1. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. -...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. VINAY ...
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2001
|
Date of Upload: 16-08-2012
Bajaj Allianz Bajaj Allianz Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Airport General Insurance Bajaj
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.N.Mohan Krishna
Respondant Advocate Mr.K.Raja Rddy
First Appeal No. FA/1192/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/02/2010 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/81/2009 of District Cuddapah)1. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Lmited, Rep.by.its.Manager, GE Plaza, Airport Road,Yerwada, Pune...........Appellant(s)Versus1. 1.S.Moulali...
Case Number: 1192
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RAJDIPA BEHURA
Respondant Advocate MR. AKHIL ANAND & MR. PRAVEEN SEHRAWAT
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1699 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1600/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.Alpha 2,Adminstration Block, Bangaluru International Air...
Case Number: 1699
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V Santharam
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/11/876(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/09/2011 in Case No. CC/09/234 of District Malappuram)1. The Airport Director,Airport Authority of IndiaCalicut International Airport,Karipur,Ma...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S.C.V.NARASIMHAM
Respondant Advocate S.RAMA CHANDRA PRASAD
First Appeal No. FA/986/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/08/2010 in Case No. 189/2008 of District Rangareddi)1. 1.M.AMARNATH,AIRPORT SERVICES MANAGER,EMIRATES AIRLINES RAJIV GANDHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTSHAMSHABAD,HYDERABAD AP, INDIAHYDERABADANDHRA PRADESH2. 3.NAVIN MASOOD,CONSUM...
Case Number: 986
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.Appa Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s Vijaya Sagi
First Appeal No. FA/735/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/07/2008 in Case No. 875/2007 of District Hyderabad-I)1. Jogram Tejavath S/o Lt. Topa Tajavath, Aged :About 46 yrs, Occ:AdvocateR/o Ameerpet,Hyd...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Air Deccan I.G.I Airport Terminal,I-BNew Delhi....
Case Number: 735
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Airport Authority Of India Airport
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate POWER OFF ATTORNY HOLDER.K.P.ABDULLAKOYA
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMMALAPPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/09/2341. MOROLY ALIS/O PATHUMMAKUTTY RESIDING NANGAMVEETIL,FEROKE,FEROKECOLLEGE,KOZHIKODEKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIAREP AIRPORT DIRACTER,CALICUTINTERNATIONALAIRPORT,KARIPOOR MA...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Airport in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Airport ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Airport under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.