+ Submit Your Complaint
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: RMP Infotech Private Ltd

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008

    Default RMP Infotech Private Ltd


    Thekkumkatil House,


    P.O.Vattiamthode 670 705 Complainant

    (Rep. by Adv.V.K.George)

    1. Mathew

    Uppukandathil House,

    P.O.Kalluvayal, (Via)Iritty.

    (Rep. by Adv.Sreejith Kanhal)

    2. M/s.RMP Infotech Private Ltd., Opposite parties

    F1 floor, Apollo Dubai Plaza, 100

    Mahalingapuram, Main Road,

    Chennai 34.

    O R DE R

    Smt.K.P.Preethakumari, Member

    This is a complaint filed under section 12 of consumer protection Act for an order directing the opposite parties to return back Rs. 6790/- with Rs.10, 000/- as compensation.

    The complainantís case is that the opposite party is his neighbour and hence they are known to each other. During 2008 May the opposite party approached the complainant and represented that he is the dealer of some famous companies and will provide the products of that companies for the factory price. The opposite party promised to give 3 ľ meter suit for Rs.4490/- and a microwave over having ISI mark Rs.2300/-. Believing the words the complainant gave the amount to opposite party on 23.5.08 as per invoice dt.4.6.08 and receipt dt.23.5.08. But the opposite party has not delivered the item even after a lapse of two months. But on 20.7.08, the 1st opposite party has given a packet. The complainant realized that he was cheated by the opposite party while he has opened the packet. The packet contains suit of Slya Ramnís instead of Vimal without sufficient quality and ISI mark. More over the oven also without company mark or guarantee. So the complainant complained about the same to opposite party. The opposite party told that the suit and microwave oven given by him is having sufficient quality. But on enquiry the complainant realized that the suit supplied is only having value of less than Rs.1000/- and oven having Rs.700/- . But the opposite party was not ready to return back the money or to take back the articles. Hence this complaint.

    On receiving notice from the Forum, the opposite party appeared and filed his version. According to him complainant is not a consumer since he is conducting a chain business and for that purpose he had purchased the above said articles from the son of the opposite party. Since he is working with RMP InfoTech Pvt. Ltd., which is a chain business concern. So the opposite party has not received any amount from the complainant and hence he is not liable to pay any amount to the complainant. So the complainant has to sue against the above said MP InfoTech Pvt. Ltd., company and hence the complaint is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. Subsequently 1st opposite party was absent and hence he is set exparte.

    Later on the above said RMP InfoTech Pvt. Ltd. was arrayed as 2nd opposite party. Even though notice is acknowledged by 2nd opposite party they are absent and hence set exparte.

    The main point to be decided is whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties?

    The evidence in this case consists of the chief affidavit filed in lieu of chief examination and Exts.A1 and A2.

    The Exts.A1 is the VAT invoice to the complainant and the receipt date is 23.5.08. As per this the complainant had purchased an Induction cooker (Open Microwave oven) for Rs.2300/- and premium suit for Rs.4490/- and the total bill amount is Rs.6790/-. This proves that the complainant had purchased the above materials from 2nd opposite party for Rs.6790/-. The complainant contended that 1st opposite party had worked as a dealer and through 1st opposite party he had purchased the same. But 1st opposite party has not adduced any evidence to prove his contention that he has no relation with the above transaction. More over 2nd opposite party has not even appeared even though he had received notice. This itself shows the deficiency of opposite parties. So we are of the opinion that there is deficiency on the part of opposite parties for which they are liable to compensate the complainant either by replacing the suit and induction cooker or refund the value i.e. Rs.6790/- with Rs.2000/- as the cost and compensation and the complainant is entitled to receive the same.

    In the result, the complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties either to replace the suit and induction cooker as promised or to refund its value Rs.6790/- In addition to this, opposite parties are also directed to pay Rs.2000/- (Rupees Two thousand only) as compensation and cost to the complainant within one month from the date of receipt of this order. The complainant is also directed to return back the suit and induction cooker upon the event of such payment. In default complainant is at liberty to execute the order under the provisions of consumer protection act.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2012

    Default Check Dealers of yours

    Sir/ Madam, I want to buy some product from your company. Somebody said that he is one of the dealer of our company. I can't believe that information from him. I need full details about the dealer having the TIN number = 33661502016. He gave mobile number but his mobile is now switched off. And again he is saying that if you join with me you will get monthly minimum of rs.2000. Please give full info about your's. Thank you,14-01-2012.

+ Submit Your Complaint

Similar Threads

  1. Kaveri Infotech
    By Sidhant in forum Desktop
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-11-2009, 10:30 PM
  2. Vipro Infotech
    By admin in forum Judgments
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-03-2009, 02:56 PM
  3. I.S.D. Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
    By Advocate.sonia in forum Judgments
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-02-2009, 04:55 PM
  4. M/s.Pushpam Infotech Corporation
    By Sidhant in forum Judgments
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-31-2009, 12:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts