Maharashtra

Central Mumbai

CC/19/162

Mr. Gururaj Meghraj - Complainant(s)

Versus

Vodafone India Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Sunita Kabade

01 Oct 2019

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI
Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi Hospital
Parel, Mumbai-400 012 Phone No. 022-2417 1360
Website- www.confonet.nic.in
 
Complaint Case No. CC/19/162
( Date of Filing : 07 Aug 2019 )
 
1. Mr. Gururaj Meghraj
Flat No 301, Sonal Society, Panch Pakhadi, Near Saraswati High School, Thane (W), 400602
Thane
Maharashtra
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Vodafone India Ltd
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
2. Mr. Sunil Sood
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
3. Shyamala Gopinath
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
4. Mr. Vivek Badrinath
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
5. Mr. John William Lorimer Otty
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
6. Balesh Sharma
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
7. Mr. Analjit Singh
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
8. citranjan Dua
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
9. Mr. Vikram Singh Mehta
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
10. Ashwani Windlass
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
11. Ravinder Thakkar
Peninsula Corporate Park Hutch House, A and B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai 400013
Mumbai
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. G.K.RATHOD PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. PREETHI CHAMIKUTTY MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 01 Oct 2019
Final Order / Judgement

Heard Complainants counsel at length.  Relief prayed by Complainant is to provide proper network at residence of Complainant. Learned advocate for Complainant has argued that it has been one year since he has raised a grievance with O.P., but they have still not rectified the problem. From annexures it can be seen that O.P. has written to Complainants society seeking permission to install mobile tower, which Complainant has himself informed to O.P. that has been denied due to fear of radiation (Ex.E Pg.36).   Further at Ex.G, Pg.44, O.P. has  also informed Complainant that there is technical infeasibility to install booster at his location however OP have assured they will take steps for implementation subject to approvals from concerned authorities/society.

Under the circumstances, we come to conclusion that OP is unable to provide network at the present time, due to parameters beyond their control which they have assured Complainant of resolving in due course.

Installation of mobile towers would be a time taking process, therefore we concur with the reply given by OP to the present problem. Accordingly complaint is dismissed in limine.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. G.K.RATHOD]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. PREETHI CHAMIKUTTY]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.