Pondicherry

Pondicherry

CC/31/2016

P Nagamani S/o Parasuraman - Complainant(s)

Versus

Vodafone India Ltd Head Office and 1 others - Opp.Party(s)

party in person

21 Nov 2017

ORDER

Final Order1
Final Order2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/31/2016
 
1. P Nagamani S/o Parasuraman
No.22 Usha Street, Ariyur, Puducherry 60102
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Vodafone India Ltd Head Office and 1 others
Pensula Corporate, Park Hutch house, A and B ganapatrao, Kadan Marg, In Lower Farel, Mumbai 400013
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN PRESIDENT
  MR. V.V. STEEPHEN MEMBER
  D. KAVITHA MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 21 Nov 2017
Final Order / Judgement

                           BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PONDICHERRY

 

                                          C.C.No. 31/2016

 

Dated this the 21st day of November 2017

 

(Date of Institution: 08.08.2016)

 

P. Nagamani, son of Parasuraman  

No.22, Usha Street                     

Ariyur, Puducherry

                                                …. Complainant

Vs.

1. Vodafone India Ltd., (Head Office)

    Pensula Corporate, Park Hutch House                    

    A and B Ganapatrao,          

    Kadan Marg,  In Lower farel

    Mumbai – 400 013.

 

2. The Manager

    C/o Vodafone Store, 

    No.6, Villianur Main Road

    Reddiyarpalayam,     

    Puducherry – 605 010.

      …         Opposite Parties

                                                                  

BEFORE:

 

          THIRU.A.ASOKAN, B.A., B.L.,

          PRESIDENT 

 

Thiru V.V. STEEPHEN, B.A., LL.B., 

           MEMBER

 

Tmt. D. KAVITHA, B.A., LL.B., 

           MEMBER

                            

FOR THE COMPLAINANT            :  Party-in-person   

 

FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTIES   :  Thiru S. Vimal, Advocate,

                                                         

O R  D  E  R

                    

          This is a complaint filed u/s 12  of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for directing the Opposite Parties to pay a sum of Rs.95,000/- towards compensation for loss and mental agony and a sum of Rs.5,000/- towards cost of this complaint.        

          2. Notice to the opposite parties were duly served.  The opposite parties appeared through Counsel and filed reply version.  The complainant was examined as CW1 and Exs.C1 to C10 were marked.  One Thiru S. Athmanandha Perumal, General Manager – Legal of OPs examined as RW1 and Ex.R1 was marked.  Hence, the matter was posted for arguments. 

          3. Today this complaint was called.  Complainant present.  OP absent.  Counsel Present.  Complainant filed memo and not pressed the complaint.  Hence, this complaint is dismissed as not pressed.    The memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

Dated this the 21st day of November 2017.

 

 

  1.  ASOKAN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

(V.V. STEEPHEN)

MEMBER

 

 

 

 

(D. KAVITHA)

MEMBER

 

LIST OF COMPLAINANT'S WITNESSES:

 

PW1           29.12.2016           Nagamani          

 

LIST OF OPPOSITE PARTIES WITNESSES:

 

RW1           23.03.2017           Athmanandha Perumal

 

LIST OF COMPLAINANT'S EXHIBITS:

 

Ex.C1

03.07.2016

SMS copy of message sent by OP company

Ex.C2

03.07.2016

SMS copy of message sent by OP company

Ex.C3

03.07.2016

SMS copy of message sent by OP company

Ex.C4

04.07.2016

SMS copy of message sent by OP company

Ex.C5

05.07.2016

 SMS copy of message sent by OP company

Ex.C6

06.07.2016

 SMS copy of message sent by OP company

Ex.C7

06.07.2016

SMS copy of message sent by OP company

Ex.C8

08.07.2016

Photocopy of complaint registered number

Ex.C9

15.07.2016

SMS copy of message sent by OP company

Ex.C10

05.07.2016

Photocopy of complaint given by complainant to OP2

 

LIST OF OPPOSITE PARTIES EXHIBITS: 

 

Ex.R1                   11.02.2016           True copy of Resolution of Authorisation

 

 

 

  1. ASOKAN)

                 PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

(V.V. STEEPHEN)

       MEMBER

 

 

 

(D. KAVITHA)

      MEMBER

 

EXTRACT OF MEMO FILED BY THE COMPLAINANT

 

நான் வோடாபோன் மேல் கொடுத்த வழக்கு நடந்துகொண்டிருக்கும் பொழுதே புகார் தாரராகிய நானும் எதிர்தாரரும்  குறைதீர்ப்பு  மன்றத்தின் வெளியில் பேசி இந்த வழக்கை முடித்துக் கொள்வதாக ஒத்துக்கொண்டேன்.  மேலும் இந்த வழக்கு சம்பந்தமாக  எந்த ஒரு மேல் முறையீடும் செய்யமாட்டேன்  என்று உறுதி அளிக்கிறேன். இந்த வழக்கை வாபஸ் பெறுகிறேன் .

 

Sd/-                     

                   COMPLAINANT                     

/ TRUE COPY /

 

 

  1. ASOKAN)

                  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

                (V.V. STEEPHEN)

                         MEMBER

 

 

 

                (D. KAVITHA)

      MEMBER

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN]
PRESIDENT
 
[ MR. V.V. STEEPHEN]
MEMBER
 
[ D. KAVITHA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.