View 151 Cases Against Diagnostic Centre
DEWAN DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE filed a consumer case on 28 May 2019 against VINITA KUMAR TOMAR in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is RP/133/2018 and the judgment uploaded on 31 May 2019.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA
Revision Petition No.133 of 2018
Date of Institution: 16.10.2018
Date of Decision: 28.05.2019
1. Dewan Diagnostic Centre, 614, Model Town, Opposite Ram Sharnam Asharam, Panipat-132103 through its Proprietor.
2. Dr. Manisha Dewan, Proprietor, Dewan Diagnostic Centre, 614, Model Town, Opposite Ram Sharnam Asharam, Panipat-132103.
…Petitioners
Versus
Mrs. Vinita Kumari Tomar, aged 48 years, wife of Shri Sanjay Kumar Tomar, resident of House No.807, Sector 13-17, HUDA, Panipat through her SPA (husband) Shri Sanjay Kumar Tomar.
...Respondent
CORAM : Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President.
Shri Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.
Present: Shri Amit Sharma, counsel for the petitioners.
O R D E R
T.P.S. MANN, J. (ORAL)
The petitioners, who are the opposite parties in the complaint titled “Mrs. Vinita Kumar Tomar Vs. Dewan Diagnostic Centre” have filed the instant revision under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 wherein they have prayed that the aforementioned complaint be set aside alongwith all the subsequent proceedings initiated in the said complaint.
2. On the last date of hearing i.e. 26.02.2019, none had put in appearance on behalf of the complainant, who is the respondent herein. However, in the interest of justice, the proceedings were adjourned for today. The position remains the same, even today as none has put in appearance for the respondent/complainant.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the aforementioned complaint has since been dismissed in default by the learned District Forum, Panipat for want of prosecution on 24.05.2019 as the complainant did not put in appearance and when it was taken up at 4 P.M. and none had appeared, further wait was found to be not justified.
4. Copy of the order dated 24.05.2019 downloaded by learned counsel for the petitioners from the website has been produced by him, which is taken on record.
5. In view of the fact that the complaint itself stands dismissed in default for want of prosecution, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of.
28.05.2019 | (Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member | (T.P.S. Mann) President |
U.K.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.