Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

RP/48/2020

Bank Of Baroda - Complainant(s)

Versus

Vinay Shankar Rai - Opp.Party(s)

Anil Kumar Mishra

26 Nov 2020

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
Revision Petition No. RP/48/2020
( Date of Filing : 23 Nov 2020 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/11/2020 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/20/2020 of District Azamgarh)
 
1. Bank Of Baroda
Branch Sankat Mochan at mandir Complex, P.O._Lanka Through Branch Manager, Varanasi U.P.-221005
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Vinay Shankar Rai
S/O Mr. Ram prasad Rai, The partner of M/S Vendors India, R/O B-63A, Akashvani, Shivaji Nagar Colony, Chhittupur, Mahmoorganj, Varanasi-U.P. 221010 & Present residing at New Colony vill-Nibi, Belaisa Post_Sadar Distt-Azamgarh U.P.-276001
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 26 Nov 2020
Final Order / Judgement

 R/48/2020   

                   Bank of Baroda V/s Vinay Shankar Rai and another

                        26-11-2020      

            Learned Counsel Sri Anil Kumar Mishra appeared for revisionist and moved amendment application to implead Smt. Sweta Rai as opposite party No.02 in revision petition.

            Smt. Sweta Rai is opposite party No.02 of complaint. Therefore, her impleadment in revision petition is necessary for proper disposal of revision petition.

            In view of above application is allowed. Let amendment be incorporated in revision petition today.             

           

            President                        Member                    Member                                    

                                                    GY                            VS

 

                                                                        ORAL

     R/48/2020           

             Bank of Baroda V/s Vinay Shankar Rai and another

                        26-11-2020      

            Amendment allowed vide above order was incorporated in revision petition.

            Learned Counsel Sri Anil Kumar Mishra appeared for revisionist.

            We have heard learned Counsel for the revisionist.

            It is contended by learned Counsel for the revisionist that the impugned order passed by District Consumer Commission is without jurisdiction and against law.

            It is further contended by learned Counsel for the revisionist that the proceeding under SARFAESI Act 2002 is pending for recovery of loan in question. Therefore, the complaint is not maintainable under the Consumer Protection Act.

            It is further contended by learned Counsel for the revisionist that the impugned order has been passed exparte without affording opportunity of hearing to revisionist.

            We have considered the submission made by learned Counsel for the revisionist.

            The impugned interim order has been passed by District Consumer Commission in absence of revisionist and without affording opportunity of hearing to him.

            Considering all facts and circumstances of the case we are of the view that the revisionist should be given opportunity to file objection before District Consumer Commission and the District Consumer Commission should pass order in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to both parties. It further appears proper that till disposal of objection filed by revisionist before District Consumer Commission, no coercive steps should be taken against revisionist.

            Revision petition is disposed of finally as above with liberty to revisionist to file objection before District Consumer Commission within 30 days from today. If objection is filed before District Consumer Commission by revisionist, the District Consumer Commission shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to both parties within 30 days from the date on which objection was filed.

            It is further provided that no coercive steps shall be taken against revisionist for securing execution of impugned order till objection filed by the revisionist within above stipulated period is disposed of as directed above.

 

            President                        Member                    Member                                   

                                                     GY                            VS

Pnt.

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN]
PRESIDENT
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.