Ghaziabad Development Authority, petitioner herein, was opposite party before the District Forum. In short, the facts are that respondent Vijender Singh purchased a house under Tatakal Plan and paid a sum of Rs.3,90,000/- which was the estimated cost. Possession was delivered to the respondent on 27.7.1996. On 14.9.1998, petitioner -2- increased the price by Rs. 80,847/- fixing the final price at Rs.4,70,847/-. Respondent did not deposit the price. On 11.4.2001, petitioner made a demand of additional amount of Rs.1,60,204/-. Respondent being aggrieved filed a complaint before the District Forum which was allowed. It was held that the petitioner could not increase the price of the house after two years of handing over of the possession to the respondent. The State Commission in appeal has affirmed the order passed by the District Forum. We agree with the view taken by the foras below and find no infirmity in the impugned order. Revision petition is dismissed.
......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER | | 
