Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/20/294

MATHEW K.V - Complainant(s)

Versus

VAYALATH AUTOMOBILES PVT LTD - Opp.Party(s)

18 May 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/20/294
( Date of Filing : 09 Oct 2020 )
 
1. MATHEW K.V
VADAKUMTHALA 940-A, VADAUMTHALA, KARSHAKA ROAD, ERNAKULAM
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. VAYALATH AUTOMOBILES PVT LTD
KARUMPANAL COMPLEX, OPP WYTE FORT HOTEL, NH BY PASS, MARADU
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 18 May 2024
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, ERNAKULAM.

                                          Dated this the day of 18th day of May 2024

                            

           PRESENT:

 

 Shri.D.B.Binu                                                                     President

 Shri. V. Ramachandran                                                       Member

 Smt. Sreevidhia T.N.                                                          Member

 

C.C. No. 294/2020

 

Complainant

Mathew K.V., S/o.Varkey, Residing at Vadakkumthala House, 940-A, Vadaumthala, Karshaka Road, Ernakulam, Pin-682 016

(By Adv.Ajeesh S.Brite, Abhilash Augustine M., Stephy Joseph, T.K.C.Road, Near Lourd Hospital, Vaduthala, Ernakulam, Pin-682 023)

 

Vs.

Opposite parties

1)     The Manager, Vayalath Automobiles Pvt. Ltd., Karumpanal Complex Opp. Whyte Fort Hotel, NH By Pass, Maradu, Kundannoor-682 304

(o.p 1 rep. by Adv.Jithin Paul Varghese)

 

 

2)     The Manager, Mahindra Electric Mobility Ltd., 8th Floor Gold Hill Square Software Park, # 690, Hosur Road, Bomanahalli, Bangalore, Karnataka-560 068

(o.p 2 rep.by Adv.Saji Mathew, M/s.S.G.Chancery Chambers, 64/3147, Kalabhavan Road, Cochin-18)

O R D E R

 

Sreevidhia T.N., Member

 

          Complainant represented.  Opposite party 1 represented.  2nd opposite party also represented. The counsel of the 1st opposite party submitted a ‘settlement memo’ stated that the matter has been settled between the parties.  Subsequently, learned counsel for the complainant also endorsed that the ‘matter settled’.  Hence the case is closed as ‘settled’.

Pronounced in the open Commission on this the 18th day of May 2024

 

 

                                                Sd/-

                                                                   Sreevidhia.T.N, Member 

 

Sd/-

                                                                             D.B.Binu, President

 

Sd/-

V. Ramachandran, Member

 

 

Forwarded by Order

 

 

 

Assistant Registrar

 

 

 

 

uk/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.