Santro - Complainant(s)


Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Shri Subhash Maan

02 Feb 2024


Complaint Case No. CC/314/2022
( Date of Filing : 03 Nov 2022 )
1. Santro
Aged about 42 years W/o Sh. Suresh R/o Vill. Dharamgarh, Tehsil Madlauda, Distt. Panipat.
1. Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.
Shakti Bhawan, Sector-6, Panchkula, through its Chairman/Secretary.
2. Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.
Sub Division Madlauuda, Panipat, through its Executive Engineer.
3. Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.
through its SDO 'OP' Sub Division, Madlauda, Panipat.
  Dr. R. K. Dogra PRESIDENT
  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary MEMBER
Shri Subhash Maan, Advocate for complainant.
......for the Complainant
Shri Ajay Kumar, Advocate for respondents/opposite parties.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 02 Feb 2024
Final Order / Judgement

No evidence of complainant is present. A date is requested on behalf of the complainant, which is opposed. Heard. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 13.06.2023. No effort has been made by the complainant to produce the evidence. Even cost of Rs.500/- not paid by complainant. Moreso, the complainant has already availed six effective opportunities. Hence, there is no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by order of this Commission.

 2.               This complaint has been filed against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties as the opposite parties have sent wrong electricity bill to the complainant. In reply, all the allegations have been denied by the respondents.

3.                As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove her case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs.

4.                This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the record-room.

[ Dr. R. K. Dogra]
[ Dr. Rekha Chaudhary]

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!


Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number


Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.