Haryana

Karnal

CC/391/2021

Smt. Janki Kumari - Complainant(s)

Versus

Utri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Rishi Chalia

19 Nov 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint No.391 of 2021

                                                          Date of instt.09.08.2021

                                                          Date of Decision: 19.11.2024

 

Smt.Janki Kumari aged 67 years wife of Shri Bal Krishan Verma, resident of H.No.943-944, Opposite 6th Barrack, Ram Nagar, Karnal.

 

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, through its Sub Divisional Officer, (OP), Sub Division, Ram Nagar, District Karnal.

                                                                ....Opposite party.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Mrs.Neeru Agarwal……..Member

                Mrs. Sarvjeet Kaur…………Member

                               

Present:   None for the complainant.

                Shri Surinder Singh, counsel for the OP

 

                                                 

               Today the case is fixed arguments on behalf of complainant. None has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. Position remained the same on the adjourned date. It is already 03:40 PM. No further wait is justified.

                A careful perusal of the file reveals that the present complaint has been filed by the complainant in the year 2021. In the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OP on 09.12.2021. Thereafter, the complainant has availed several effective opportunities for leading his evidence and concluded the same on 06.03.2023 i.e. after more than one year and now the present case is at the stage of arguments on behalf of complainant. Now on the previous date and today also none has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. The present complaint pertains to the year 2021, further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                Hence, in view the above facts the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated: 19.11.2024.          

                    President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

  (Neeru Agarwal)              (Sarvjeet Kaur) 

Member                           Member                    

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.