Delhi

North West

CC/1131/2014

M.L.JINDAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

TPDDL - Opp.Party(s)

31 Jul 2015

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/1131/2014
 
1. M.L.JINDAL
B-22, Gidwani Road, Adarsh Nagar, Delhi-110033
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. TPDDL
TATA Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. Narela, Delhi-110040
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANWAR ALAM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. PROMILA SETH MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Mr.S.R.AGGRAWAL MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMERS DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM : NORTH WEST

CSC : BLOCK-C : POCKET-C : SHALIMAR BAGH : DELHI-110088

 

CASE NO.1131/14

Mohan Lal Jindal

B-22, Gidwani Road,

Adarsh Nagar,

Delhi-110033                                                                                                  …Complainant

Versus

 

TATA Power Delhi

Distribution Ltd.

Narela,

Delhi-110040                                                                                                  …Opposite Party

 

COMPlAINT U/S 12 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986

Coram  :        Sh. M.A. Alam, President

                        Sh. S.R. Aggarwal, Member

                        Ms. Promila Seth, Member

 

         ORDER                                    Date 20.07.2015

M.A. Alam, President

            None appeared on behalf of the complainant for the last consecutive dates i.e. 30.01.2015 and 03.07.2015.  OP filed an application on 26.09.2014 that complainant’s connection is IP connection.  This complaint is not maintainable in this forum and prayed that complaint be dismissed.

            Complainant did not file any reply.  Heard OP and perused the file and considered.  From the copy of the bill filed by the complainant (Annexure-1), it appears that electricity connection of complainant was industrial connection.  It is not alleged by the complainant in his complaint that the services availed by him exclusively for the purpose of earning his livelihood by means of self employment, therefore it is obvious that services availed by the complainant from the OP is for commercial purpose, so complainant is not a consumer under the provision of Consumer Protection Act 1986.  Hence this complaint is not maintainable.  Case be disposed of accordingly.  

Copy of this order be made available to the parties free of cost as per law and a copy be kept on separate file.  File be consigned to record room.

            Announced on this 20th July 2015.

 

 

PROMILA SETH                             S.R. AGGARWAL                       M.A.ALAM

( MEMBER )                                     ( MEMBER )                         ( PRESIDENT )

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANWAR ALAM]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. PROMILA SETH]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Mr.S.R.AGGRAWAL]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.