Orissa

Rayagada

CC/251/2016

Sri Rabindra Kumar Mohapatra - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Shriram Transport - Opp.Party(s)

Self

24 Feb 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    COMMISSION, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No.  251 / 2016.                               Date.     24   .     02  . 2021

P R E S E N T .

.

Sri  Gadadhara  Sahu,                                           President

Smt. Padmalaya  Mishra,                                     Member.

 

Sri Rabindra Kumar Mohapatra, S/O: Krupasindhu  Mohapatra,  Ramanaguda,  Dist:Rayagada,  765 001  (Odisha)                                                                                                        …. Complainant.

Versus.

1.The  Bramch   Manager, M/S. Sriram  Transport Finance Co. Ltd., Rayagada.

.                                                                       .…..Opp.Parties

Counsel for the parties:                         

For the complainant: - Sri  K.A. Ramachandran,Advocate.

For the O.Ps:- Sri K.Ch.G.S.Kumandan, Advocate, Rayagada.

                                                           

JUDGEMENT

          The  crux of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for  non release  of   finance  vehicle OR-06-C-8805 TATA LPT 163 FBT for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.

          The  O.Ps have issued NOC in favour of the complainant towards the finance vehicle. The  present dispute between the complainant & O.Ps have settled with full and final  satisfaction  of  the complaint  and provide proper service  and no claim further  against them from the complainant as the dispute solved  among themselves. Hence the complainant  prays the forum to dispose the case accordingly  as settled out of the court.

          Heard from the parties. During the course of hearing the O.Ps have not objected the memo filed by  the complainant.  Perused  the   record  and  memo  filed by the complainant inter alia NDC  issued by the O.Ps.  The memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  off  but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   do not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after settled the matter amicably out of court.  Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

               

Dictated and corrected by me.       Pronounced on this           24 th    Day of       February, 2021.

               

                                                                                Member.                                              President.

 

 

`

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.