Karnataka

Gadag

CC/180/2022

The Proprietor Shringar Printers - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Proprietor , Smt. Samadevi Jagadish Bishnoi - Opp.Party(s)

P.S.Dharmayat

24 Jan 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GADAG
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONBehind Tahsildar Office, Basaveshwar Nagar, GADAG
 
Complaint Case No. CC/180/2022
( Date of Filing : 25 Oct 2022 )
 
1. The Proprietor Shringar Printers
D.R. Badi Publications, Betgeri-Gadag, Subas Road, Near Bus Stand, BETGERI-GADAG-582102
Gadag
Karnataka
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Proprietor , Smt. Samadevi Jagadish Bishnoi
Balaji Stationery Mart Khadar Building , Veersavarkar Road, Shop No. 10-4-56A 24, Famous Commercial Complex Near City Bus Stand, UDUPI-576101
udupi
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. D.Y Basapur PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri Raju Namadev Metri MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Yashoda Bhaskar Patil MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 24 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES

REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GADAG.

Basaveshwar Nagar, Opp: Tahasildar Office, Gadag

 

 

COMPLAINT NO.180/2022

 

DATED  24th DAY OF JANUARY-2023

BEFORE:

 

 

HON'BLE Mr. D.Y. BASAPUR B.Com, L.L.B(Spl.,)

 

                                                                 PRESIDENT    

                                                 

 

 HON'BLE Mr. RAJU. N. METRI, B.Com, L.L.B(Spl.,)

                                                                    MEMBER

     

HON'BLE Mrs. YASHODA BHASKAR PATIL,

                                                 B.Com, L.L.B(Spl.,) M.Ed.,

                                                      WOMAN MEMBER                                                                                

 

 

 

Complainant:       1)   The Proprietor

                                           Shrinagar Printers,

                                           D.R.Badi Publications,

                                           Betageri-Gadag.

                                           Subas Road, Near Bus-Stand

                                            Betageri-Gadag-582102.

                                                                                     

                                        (Rep. by Sri.P.S. Dharmayat, Advocate)   

            

 

V/s

 Opposite party   :-

 

The Proprietor,

Smt. Samadevi Jagadish Bishnoi

Balajai Stationery Mart,

Khadar Building, Veersavarkar

Road, Shop No.10-4-56A 24,

Famous Commercial Complex,

Near City Bus-Stand, Udupi-576101. 

 

   

 

                (Absent)  

JUDGEMENT

JUDGEMENT DELIVERED BY SMT. YASHODA. B. PATIL, WOMAN MEMBER

 

          The complainant has filed the complaint U/Sec. 35 (1) (a) (i) of C.P Act, 2019, for recovery of arrears of Rs.61,350/- with interest @ 18% p.a. from 8.05.2019 till realization, Rs.1,00,000/- towards mental agony and cost of the litigation.  

          2. The brief facts of complaint are as under:-

          The complainant is a proprietor of Shringar Printers, D.R.Badi Publications, and is doing the printing and selling of table books (Maggi) and other books for students.  Opponent being the proprietor of Balaji Stationery Mart Udupi and is a regular customer and used to buy the students purpose books.  On 08.05.2019 the Opponent placed order through phone under the order Form No.36. Complainant supplied the through VLR Transportation the table books (Maggi) and issued the pay bill bearing No.77 on 29.07.2019 for Rs.44,000/- and another bill No.78 on 31.07.2019 for Rs.44,550/-. On 25.12.2019 the Opponent phoned the complainant and said he is sending a cheque of Rs.10,000/- for payment of old balance  due amount of Rs.6,800/- dtd:25.12.2019 and the balance amount of Rs.3,200/- to be adjusted towards the transaction of 08.05.2019 after deducting Rs.3,200/- out of the remaining balance of  Rs.84,550/-, the outstanding balance due was Rs.81,350/-. Opponent had sent two cheques of Rs.10,000/- each on 22.09.2021, after deducting the cheque amount of Rs.20,000/- out of Rs.81,350/- the remaining balance amount due is Rs.61,350/- as shown in the schedule. Inspite of repeated request to pay the balance amount the Op postponed the said demand.  Therefore, complainant got issued a legal notice on 10.08.2022 through advocate, it was Cocky because the opponent has negatived to receive and to reply or pay the amount.  On 22.09.2021 Opponent paid Rs.10,000/- through cheque bearing No.041210 of S.V.C, Bank Udupi. Therefore,  the OP has committed the deficiency of service. Hence, the complainant had filed the complaint No.135/22 and the said complaint is withdrawn was due to non-availability of documents. Hence, filed this complaint.

 

          3.      After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the OP, it was returned as unclaimed and Op has remained absent.

 

           4.  To prove the case, the complainant has filed affidavit and was examined as PW-1 and got the documents marked as  Ex.C-1 to Ex.C-6.

          5. Counsel for complainant argued.


          6. The points for consideration are as under:


                   1. Whether the complainant proves the deficiency of    

                     service committed by the  Opponent?


                   2. Whether the complainant is entitled

    for the reliefs  as sought for?


                   3. What order?


          7.  Our findings on the above points are as under:


               1) Point No 1. In the affirmative.  

               2) Point No 2. In the partly affirmative. 

              3) Point No 3. See final order.


 

REASONS

8 .Point No.1 and 2: The point No.1 and 2 are taken together to avoid the repetition of facts.

9. On careful perusal of all the documents and materials placed before the commission, PW -1 has reiterated the contents of the complaint.  PW-1 has stated that, the complainant is a proprietor of Shringar Printers, D.R.Badi Publications, and is doing the printing and selling of table books (Maggi) and other books for students.  Opponent being the proprietor of Balaji Stationery Mart Udupi and is a regular customer and used to buy the students purpose books.  On 08.05.2019 the Opponent placed order through phone under the order Form No.36. Complainant supplied the through VLR Transportation the table books (Maggi) and issued the pay bill bearing No.77 on 29.07.2019 for Rs.44,000/- and another bill No.78 on 31.07.2019 for Rs.44,550/-. On 25.12.2019 the Opponent phoned the complainant and said he is sending a cheque of Rs.10,000/- for payment of old balance  due amount of Rs.6,800/- dtd:25.12.2019 and the balance amount of Rs.3,200/- to be adjusted towards the transaction of 08.05.2019 after deducting Rs.3,200/- out of the remaining balance of  Rs.84,550/-, the outstanding balance due was Rs.81,350/-. Opponent had sent two cheques of Rs.10,000/- each on 22.09.2021, after deducting the cheque amount of Rs.20,000/- out of Rs.81,350/- the remaining balance amount due is Rs.61,350/- as shown in the schedule. Inspite of repeated request to pay the balance amount the Op postponed the said demand.  Therefore, complainant got issued a legal notice on 10.08.2022 through advocate, and the opponent has negatived to receive and to reply or pay the amount.  On 22.09.2021 Opponent paid Rs.10,000/- through cheque bearing No.041210 of S.V.C, Bank Udupi. Therefore,  the OP has committed the deficiency of service. Hence, the complainant had filed the complaint No.135/22 and the said complaint is withdrawn was due to non-availability of documents.

          10. Ex.C-1 order Form reveals that on 08.05.2019, Op placed the order through phone in Form No.36, Ex.C-2 bill  No.77 issued by complainant on 29.07.2019 for Rs.40,000/- and Ex.C-3 bill No.78 issued by complainant on 31.07.2019 for Rs.44,550/-. Therefore,, as per Ex.C-1 order placed by the Op, complainant supplied as per Ex.C-2 and Ex.C-3 through VRL Vide invoice No.56 and 57 Ex.C-4 & Ex.C-5 receipts. Copy of the bank account of complainant reveal that, on 02.11.2021 and 09.11.2021 Rs.20,000/- is credited. Ex.C-6 is legal notice issued by counsel for complainant demanding to pay the arrears of Rs.61,350/-, Op did not reply or settle the claim. Even, he has refused to receive the notice issued through RPAD and notice is returned with an endorsement as unclaimed. So, oral and documentary evidence of the complainant is remained unchallenged and not disputed by the Op. There are no reasons to disbelieve the case of the complainant. Hence, complainant has proved that, Op has committed the deficiency of service.

11. For the above, complainant has proved that, the Op has committed the deficiency of service and he is entitled for a sum of Rs.61,350/-. Complainant is claiming interest at the rate of 18 % p.a. which is on higher side.  So, as per rate of interest in the Nationalized Bank it is proper to award interest @ 9% p.a. from the date i.e. Ex.C-3  from 01.08.2019 till realization. Complainant has suffered mental agony, therefore he is entitled for a sum of Rs.15,000/- for mental agony and Rs.10,000/- towards cost of litigation. Accordingly, we answer point No.1 in the affirmative and point No.2 in the partly affirmative.

12.    Point No.3:- In the result, we proceed to pass the following: 

ORDER

          The complaint filed U/Sec.35(1) (a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is hereby allowed.

 

          The complainant is entitled a sum of Rs.61,350/- with interest @ 9% p.a. from 01.08.2019 till realization.

 

Further, the complainant is entitled a sum of Rs.15,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.10,000/- towards cost of litigation.

 

Op is directed to pay the above amount within two months from the date of this order.

 

Office is directed to send the copies of this order to the parties free of cost.

 

           (Dictated to the Stenographer, directly on computer, corrected and then pronounced by us in the Open Commission on this 24th Day of
January-2023)

,            

 

 (Shri Raju N. Metri)     (Shri. D.Y. Basapur)   (Smt.Yashoda Bhaskar. Patil)

        MEMBER                 PRESIDENT              WOMAN MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-: ANNEXURE :-

 

EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF COMPLAINANT/S:

PW-1: Sri. Dharmasa Rukumasa Badi

DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF COMPLAINANT/S

Ex.C-1 : The original order Form No.36.

Ex.C-2 : The original   bearing bill No.77, dtd:29.07.2019.

Ex.C-3 : The original   bearing bill No.78, dtd:31.07.2019.

Ex.C-4 : The Original VRL Logistics Ltd., Consignor’s copies.  

Ex.C-5 : The Original VRL Logistics Ltd., Consignor’s copies. 

Ex.C-6 : Legal notice.

EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF OPs:

 

              NIL

 

DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF OPs

              NIL

 

 

 

 

 

(Shri Raju N. Metri)    (Shri. D.Y. Basapur)   (Smt.Yashoda Bhaskar. Patil)

        MEMBER                 PRESIDENT              WOMAN MEMBER

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. D.Y Basapur]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri Raju Namadev Metri]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Yashoda Bhaskar Patil]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.