Haryana

Karnal

CC/395/2021

Anoop Oil Company - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Prop./Partner/Auth. Signatory Sachdeva Enterprises - Opp.Party(s)

Kuldeep Singh Kalsoura

13 Aug 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

 

                                                                     Complaint No.395 of 2021

                                                                     Date of instt. 10.08.2021

                                                                     Date of Decision: 13.08.2021

 

 

Anoop Oil Company, Chhuchhakwas Jhajjar-Dadari Road, Jhajjar, Haryana, through its Proprietor Vinay Dabas.

                                                                             …….Complainant

                                                 Versus

1.       The Prop/Partner/Auth Signatory Sachdeva Enterprises Shop No.536, Near DAV College, for Women Karnal.

2.       The Manager, Samsung Smart Café, Corporate Office: 20 to 24th Floor Two Horizon Centre, Gold Course Road, DLF Phase-5, Sector-43, Gurugram, Haryana 122202

                                                                             …..Opposite parties

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

 

Before        Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.        

                   Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member

 

Present:     None for complainant.

         

                    Today the case was fixed for consideration on the point of maintainability of complaint. The present complaint has been filed by complainant Vinay Dabas in the capacity of proprietor of Anoop Oil Company but there is no document on file in order to ascertain the fact that he is proprietor of the said firm. Neither today nor yesterday none has appeared on behalf of complainant in order to explain that the complainant is proprietor of the said firm. It seems that the complainant is not interested in persuing his complaint.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is dismissed. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated: 13.08.2021

    President,         

District Consumer Disputes   
Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)     

     Member                        

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.