Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/52/2022

Suhara - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager - Opp.Party(s)

Mohananan Nambiar

05 Sep 2022

ORDER

C.D.R.C. Kasaragod
Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/52/2022
( Date of Filing : 18 Mar 2022 )
 
1. Suhara
W/o Hameed aged 56 years R/at Ayisha Manzil, Kaasi line, Thalankara, 671122
Kasaragod
Kerala
2. Abdullahil Amar A H
Aged 35 years S/o Hameed R/at Ayisha Manzil Kaasi line Thalankara 671122
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager
Kerala Bank, Kasaragod Branch,
Kasaragod
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. KRISHNAN K PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. RadhaKrishnan Nair M MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 05 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

D.O.F:18/03/2022

                                                                                                  D.O.O:05/09/2022

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

CC.No.52/2022

Dated this, the 05th day of September 2022

PRESENT:

SRI.KRISHNAN.K                         :PRESIDENT

SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR.M : MEMBER

SMT.BEENA.K.G                            : MEMBER

 

1. Suhara, W/o Hameed, aged 56 years

2. Abdullahil Amar A.H, aged 35 years,

S/o Hameed,

Both are R/at Ayisha Manzil,                                     : Complainant

Kaasi Line, Thalankara,

Kasaragod Post,

Kasaragod Taluk and District – 671122

(Adv: Mohanan Nambiar.M)

                       

                                                And

 

The Manager,

Kerala Bank, Kasaragod  Branch                           : Opposite Party

P.O Kasaragod, Kasaragod

(Adv: Chandramohan.G)

 

ORDER

SRI.KRISHNAN.K  :PRESIDENT

     The case of the complainant is that he has availed a housing loan from Opposite Party bank promising to re-pay in monthly installments.

     But due to Covid – 19 he could not repay the amount due.

     Bank proceeded for sale of property including the house their in, thus deficiency in service. 

     An exparte interim injunction order was granted infavour of the complainant.

     The Opposite Party filed version along with counter to IA saying that the complaint is not maintainable at law since steps are taken under SARFASEI.  Notice is also sent under section 13(2) of SARFASEI act and after receiving the notice complaint is filed.

    In view of the dictum laid down in 2022 (2) KHC 386 (SC) Since SARFASEI proceedings are pending and thus consumer complaint long thereafter is not maintainable at law.

     In the result complaint is dismissed.

   Sd/-                                                                   Sd/-                                         Sd/-

MEMBER                                                      MEMBER                              PRESIDENT

Forwarded by Order

 

                                                                                    Assistant Registrar

Ps/

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. KRISHNAN K]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RadhaKrishnan Nair M]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.