Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/13/71

Abdul Rahiman - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, TATA Motors Finance - Opp.Party(s)

29 Jan 2016

ORDER

C.D.R.F. Kasaragod
Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/71
 
1. Abdul Rahiman
S/o.P.C.Mammu, Businessman,R/at C.H.C. Road, Kumbla, Koipady Village
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager, TATA Motors Finance
A Division of Tata Motors Ltd, 2nd floor,Opp. Ramananda Oil Mill, South Bazar, Kannur
Kannur
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

D.O.F: 28/2/13

D.o.O:29/01/16

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                      CC.NO.71/13

                             Dated this, the 29th    day of January 2016

PRESENT:

SMT.P.RAMADEVI            : PRESIDENT

SMT.BEENA K.G               : MEMBER

SMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL    : MEMBER 

Abdul  Rahiman.P   S/o P.C.Mammu,

R/at CHC Road, Kumbla,Koipady   Kasaragod.                                       : Complainant

 

 

The Manager, TATA Motor Finance

A Division of Tata Motors .Ltd,  

2nd floor, Opp. Ramananda Oil Mill,                                                  : Opposite party

South Bazar, Kannur. 670002.

 

                                                           ORDER

 

SMT.P.RAMADEVI    : PRESIDENT

 

    Opposite party raised an issue regarding  the maintainability of the complaint before this forum in the light of the order passed by the Hon’ble National Commission  in Magna Fincorp.Ltd & others vs Praveen  Benson  & others (RP.No.1936/15) dtd. 3/11/2015.

   That the contention of the opposite party  that the complaint is barred by principles of res judicata  since  the arbitration award is  passed in respect of the same  subject matter and the complainant is not maintainable before this Forum.

  Heard both sides.  In this case an arbitration  award  is passed in respect of the same subject matter. The observation of the Hon’ble National Commission is  “ in view of the decision of the Arbitrator which is binding on parties, the forum below should not have passed an order by over looking the award”.

    On going through the above decision of the Hon’ble National Commission and on perusal of  the documents , we are of the view that the complaint is barred by principles of resjudicata and hence it is not maintainable before this Forum.  Therefore the   complaint is dismissed  .  No order as to cost.

Sd/                                                                           Sd/                                                                          Sd/

MEMBER                                                    MEMBER                                                     PRESIDENT

eva                                                                  /forwarded by order/

                                                                   SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.